On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:22 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > More specifically, ' think '\377' may be either -1 or 255 depending on > the architecture. > On most architectures, 'char' is implicitly signed, but on some others > it is not. Yeah. That code is just broken. And Arnd, your patch may be "conceptually minimal", in that it keeps thed broken code and makes it work. But it just dials up the oddity to 11. The proper patch is just this appended thing that stops playing silly games, and just uses "memcmp()". I've verified that with sane build configurations, it just generates testq %rsi, %rsi je .L25 cmpl $-33620224, (%rsi) je .L31 for that if (data && !memcmp(data, VBSF_MOUNT_SIGNATURE, 4)) { test. With a lot of crazy debug options you'll actually see the "memcmp()", but the bad code generation is the least of your options in that case. Linus