From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D513C46470 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 15:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044F62173C for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 15:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=jilayne.com header.i=@jilayne.com header.b="DLJcxGVN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728638AbfEVPaj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 11:30:39 -0400 Received: from mx1-c1.supremebox.com ([198.23.53.215]:58209 "EHLO mx1.supremebox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729495AbfEVPah (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 11:30:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jilayne.com ; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date: In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LUHKwMol6uIhzsUWmax7aLyKWtZ4HC6/4yq6oMq4kuM=; b=DLJcxGVN0rxiSt4ArbQNvuS94I nuOjqqvel+yY+efVfc4a8gDqiHaCwgqplcy1HKbrwhByxYJ7sgpD1Adr1N+6otTn0AxMPjVz5S7x3 XShjqmqBTeXBqM1dwOHgan1xXWA2QbGVrtsb9EIGGq/hBURmgYmNQqWG0L3nX7pIg+lU=; Received: from [67.164.173.226] (helo=[10.0.0.176]) by mx1.supremebox.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hTTCM-0006bB-BO; Wed, 22 May 2019 15:30:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [patch 25/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 100 From: J Lovejoy In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:30:33 -0600 Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <14DDDB3D-F543-44D5-B715-C781B59C89E5@jilayne.com> References: <20190520075121.768803433@linutronix.de> <20190520075212.908050599@linutronix.de> To: Richard Fontana X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Sender-Ident-agJab5osgicCis: opensource@jilayne.com Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org thanks Richard - really helpful to have others flagging these, as = keeping track is enough work that I=E2=80=99m not having time to review = also. But could i please ask you (and others) to not remove the original text = of Thomas=E2=80=99 email when you respond? It reduces the digging I need = to do to find the original filenames and text if you top-post (as = un-cool as that is, but you can just blame me for you un-coolness in = this case) thanks, Jilayne > On May 22, 2019, at 6:59 AM, Richard Fontana = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:05 AM Thomas Gleixner = wrote: >=20 >> neither [alan] [cox] [nor] [cymrunet] >> [ltd] admit liability nor provide warranty for any of this software >> this material is provided as is and at no charge >=20 > Since some of these disclaimer statements are getting scrutinized, > this one is also notable though it is more general than the other ones > that have been called out. I think we should decide what to do about > variously-worded warranty/liability disclaimer statements in general > and consider this variety along with others. I assume SPDX previously > never considered the problem of how to deal with license notices with > various nonstandard disclaimer statements other than implicitly > treating the ones in the GNU notice as conveying nothing more than > what's already in the GPL/LGPL license texts. >=20 > For the time being I am trying to call attention to anything that > seems even slightly interestingly different from what's in the GNU > notice ("WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE"). >=20 > Richard