From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25239C28CC3 for ; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F378D2695F for ; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:24:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559309042; bh=PdF02o/rD3t+wyvNrxQLq41/UX2h2s4D+ejyI1/rASw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=kPnfrz1FVAJRi6UWfxiO67ceEYfK5q1wXrsvUdjbdqJQNEDwR5uvJRMOxw5N5QS9F ReJe864Ri3+6AOgF/ebLtCc0b6wxbQxo+vOuxRMV9D6vlKf3ivj/iMsieUfvhEgF4J 2leCzDJMsweDSZC6pKkdd80AVc2kKd0iAiSuztJI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726563AbfEaNYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2019 09:24:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43342 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726037AbfEaNYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2019 09:24:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip67-88-213-2.z213-88-67.customer.algx.net [67.88.213.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE85B26958; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:24:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559309040; bh=PdF02o/rD3t+wyvNrxQLq41/UX2h2s4D+ejyI1/rASw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SfnWinhd9ehkso9a/1g8DKmRW3Alz36ju+PDqIVhVGE1tCmb4Qxk5jHdc9jY+QRXY 2ka5ZfCmJxcfdP4tuqEzOuXr/iSTldqv3ye/bIBJyhBdxcCUuWbB005baLbg9LK0I4 9VjeyhuKy9kLL5j6kbKcSjE/loqyMVS8FUPsV1E0= Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 06:24:00 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SPDX update for 5.2-rc3 - round 1 Message-ID: <20190531132400.GA5518@kroah.com> References: <20190531014808.GA30932@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 09:17:06AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Greg, Thomas, > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:49 AM Greg KH wrote: > > The following changes since commit cd6c84d8f0cdc911df435bb075ba22ce3c605b07: > > > > Linux 5.2-rc2 (2019-05-26 16:49:19 -0700) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git tags/spdx-5.2-rc3-1 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 96ac6d435100450f0565708d9b885ea2a7400e0a: > > > > treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Kbuild (2019-05-30 11:32:33 -0700) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > SPDX update for 5.2-rc3, round 1 > > > > Here is another set of reviewed patches that adds SPDX tags to different > > kernel files, based on a set of rules that are being used to parse the > > comments to try to determine that the license of the file is > > "GPL-2.0-or-later" or "GPL-2.0-only". Only the "obvious" versions of > > these matches are included here, a number of "non-obvious" variants of > > text have been found but those have been postponed for later review and > > analysis. > > > > There is also a patch in here to add the proper SPDX header to a bunch > > of Kbuild files that we have missed in the past due to new files being > > added and forgetting that Kbuild uses two different file names for > > Makefiles. This issue was reported by the Kbuild maintainer. > > > > These patches have been out for review on the linux-spdx@vger mailing > > list, and while they were created by automatic tools, they were > > hand-verified by a bunch of different people, all whom names are on the > > patches are reviewers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > I'm sorry, but as long[*] as this does not conform to > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, I have to provide my: > NAked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > [*] The obvious solution is to update Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, > as people have asked before. I don't understand, what does not conform? We are trying _to_ conform to that file, what did we do wrong? thanks, greg k-h