From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A10EC28CC5 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E991F2067C for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728099AbfFEPWO (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:22:14 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:42731 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726515AbfFEPWO (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:22:14 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hYXjw-0005O4-MR for linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 17:22:13 +0200 Message-Id: <20190605151832.833026453@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 17:18:32 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner To: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Subject: [ASIS-4 patch 0/5] Deep review of 'AS IS' disclaimers - part 4 Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org This is the forth variant of disclaimer modifications. Standard disclaimer: this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose Modified disclaimer: the/this program is licensed as is without any warranty of any kind whether express or implied As with the previous 3, I don't see anything contradicting or substantially different. In case we agree on that, I would amend the changelogs of the individual patches with a paragraph explaining our conclusion. Something along the lines: The pattern deviates from the standard GPLv2 disclaimer, but the modifications do not expand beyond the standard disclaimer and the NO WARRANTY section of the GPLv2. So replacing the license notice including the modified disclaimer with the SPDX license identifier results in the same protections and conditions. Feel free to suggest better wording or deeper explanation. Thanks, tglx