From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731B4C282DD for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE24217D7 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387731AbfEXCWK (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 22:22:10 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f46.google.com ([209.85.217.46]:35515 "EHLO mail-vs1-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387622AbfEXCWJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 22:22:09 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f46.google.com with SMTP id q13so4813087vso.2 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 19:22:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JC5TPsQLESTatCODsowbJw/kmpzPLq+6BLj7WpBE4xU=; b=puzz9WOuSbZfBt9kPVJjqXj8sVBb257s0hRB8spn8eGWtGbeGQ9A5ITq/L7/xCf0b3 oGzB4A7dbJNHhhBOuzugCUWOaLB8p339kbbYXyg6A8QFhHsC0o1ALl7ZOJ2qQsRWEoVi gWvJh1KUt3hmVX6NSKUUnjtSV+aZPIMUhU4+b3+x5ZqEgeQRziE1RMFQd/As/uiN/5vU dCqHlAYSeDHJiq3yLhvLB5tfLxnEzA3ky2DJkOrX8KHd5RsG1iR3wC+mgGvq56hyYBlm sEvn5yJZ3X4Lop0AStdHhas7N0ydPeJonHegjriUOIHqXPGH+Q1q0hc9PejeZgg3YNv/ SDiA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUijrqWlfOscMEWpWq8EyncYED8c3zWdrgfOUITR+hZxWWj3f/D qTQuWG2EmTYsyV0mDZ4Ki6K1MKTjozvqdV4wtUuHzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzFiVq+3Tf4dKqzrqqJ1i0f2+M8SCremGLvmyMQYsnHbS740Jz8zAJxrcJPIioiDSVYFb9p6yJjbzzNJ10pT14= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ca9a:: with SMTP id a26mr20919824vsl.92.1558664528808; Thu, 23 May 2019 19:22:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190520075121.768803433@linutronix.de> <20190520075211.039040246@linutronix.de> <20190522131836.GA28920@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20190522131836.GA28920@kroah.com> From: Richard Fontana Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 22:21:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 05/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 80 To: Greg KH Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:18 AM Greg KH wrote: > Also: > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > A: No. > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? > > http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top I come from the bottom-posting tradition and resisted top-posting for years, so I am pleased that top-posting is not appropriate for this list. (At least one other person reading this list may remember that the Harvey Birdman Rule [1] (in the process of being rebranded the Hindering Backchannels Rule) had a very strong anti-top-posting component in its original version, but this proved to be excessively harsh in practice and was modified appropriately.) I assume it's okay to put the "Reviewed-by:" at the top of the reply though? Richard [1] https://github.com/richardfontana/hbr/blob/master/HBR.md