From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F96C04A6B for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3641521479 for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:01:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557493287; bh=AszIq9eLsAFfWNGjLz7U20X6EkaPLM2WC+RZBrYfG1g=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=Od+iBCg0jawyMSVEbceOUJTSa/T91oHAHhcwg4FNjCvCxy9fwjxz5dNkdC8xIdhnX AoEyaFKqgSgp3jgex2cNTHaQsWPwExdar7VYZnHLNPDv4l5mdCjHdt+xwqSR7XTBuX gbSjai3sBt0XIF9B/NKIDsuk2R9HlzcfU/OYkHtk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727296AbfEJNB0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2019 09:01:26 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com ([209.85.208.170]:42162 "EHLO mail-lj1-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727289AbfEJNB0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2019 09:01:26 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 188so5014749ljf.9 for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Lz3Y7vmqMudKYj6u5L05cwGrMZJWyycXpSBOMzebTDI=; b=eOG/jzxNhcTaQplrLChWd1B4wuEhQhRhTktEn210jOwMmEXaubhf/BlZA75FO50BvB Cp3QmRMnZoDr4dY23G5u9JWm07fJB06KxKIL6vKD/9OsubLDm37qBbjfPTqibe8c3SvP clAVJ/rFsB78+xJD26Ey+63uzscSS7J7o/PKE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lz3Y7vmqMudKYj6u5L05cwGrMZJWyycXpSBOMzebTDI=; b=tYa5Y3Bjvagt73/pmwDrldES3SlYWRTfqHDAY8181seXlsQbSgcPeq9rEX11WW6Ffg maoyNb2fnD94wzxc1x8Z8Jum6D+2HMgXLxWaSzycT1DwqNzHlUXK/5dbdligvgiY07B7 MoSQ8VRKal8D9MPwbw3C1jMh6YOV3xdV+FWobyYXC6IZDvGr76yljk3IsQjYG3k/+Jq1 e5iCwBI0tGWsdvXRHvUzNprT6XJa4/hNV1okSnupyDm3vGbr1P4AcaIyNlqaR7tEqiTX NkXXFTcr1/gis/XGMWn2ZJ/Uok6a/tRAW43y3Cu0a/AW4GWmNN1JEBJ2tcVsh5soL7dc +2Cg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWVYkN2hmf+pA7PIQ94ye3LrTaUlwO8kE2RXfXqGqLyIw4a40sO 2Kt7olaSHeWO94xDNjysDrQ8KG7IEPOhCAbY+q7OWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzvqIDFTYMeWBkcjtQ0CZVEPysQIJlctqJWeTKa7DnyJD1yxpIetNX3mAKbvFaV/6/Xxr/0E0/GGH2sNCmzMiA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1f02:: with SMTP id f2mr5826148ljf.86.1557493284251; Fri, 10 May 2019 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kate Stewart Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 08:01:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Workflow To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:56 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Kate, > > On Thu, 9 May 2019, Kate Stewart wrote: > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:11 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Any opinions on the size of the batches and how long it will take to get > > > the reviews done or any other suggestions for a workable solution? > > > > Grouping them in digestible sets, and organizing each patch around a > > pattern makes sense to me. +1 > > I appreciate the +1, but I would appreciate even more some hint what you > think is a digestible set size and how much time you think it takes to > review such a set. You know that this is just a question of time. Heh, fair enough. I meant I am fine with the proposal of 10-25 a day you outlined. Biasing more to the 25 side is ok - sooner we're through the bulk of them the better. :-) Thanks, Kate