From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DEAC4332F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9C261074 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235064AbhI0POa (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:14:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235002AbhI0PO3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:14:29 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E67C061575; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:12:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=8XzwjHs843zXfH+an8ktBMeno92g9Ry3oPa0mEU0F9Y=; b=yl6jRQe2sVgWrVgWeBgFJ+S7oR /e90qkak+HPKGyulGJm90XMNsFK/zfGqhgLeooNqscTavy6evL0HHFNge1Zzq2VrXwArcH6vbiw4z 3Q6j+sxPlW8GcIiHNRkx4xwKkp+wy696/EKhiGyZais1OM6i0hJjjx9qbfYBhuUQt4SKr6zuTQu45 F/FuoRActMgjTHcotZ+9bHWMAaDx37a7TEZpkeobrqw45MbXni9GhYrCB553/ALZwxOFsVSQJeeQR bOJ86jrRrPfXU12tbNZQCps3ePRpwisKB7zfcqv5hmEWBJn93+QesNl3X42AveF9ZHUVHrpIrmKmh cZHPP/IQ==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mUsID-00344C-ET; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:11:45 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:11:45 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Tejun Heo Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, minchan@kernel.org, jeyu@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rafael@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, yzaikin@google.com, nathan@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, vitor@massaru.org, elver@google.com, jarkko@kernel.org, glider@google.com, rf@opensource.cirrus.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, David.Laight@aculab.com, bvanassche@acm.org, jolsa@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, trishalfonso@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, jikos@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.com, ngupta@vflare.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, bhelgaas@google.com, kw@linux.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, senozhatsky@chromium.org, hch@lst.de, joe@perches.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, jpoimboe@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, keescook@chromium.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, copyleft-next@lists.fedorahosted.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12 (RESEND)] syfs: generic deadlock fix with module removal Message-ID: References: <20210918050430.3671227-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Luis Chamberlain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 07:55:13AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:04:18PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > In this v7 I've decided it is best to merge all the effort together into > > one patch set because communication was being lost when I split the > > patches up. This was not helping in any way to either fix the zram > > issues or come to consensus on a generic solution. The patches are also > > merged now because they are all related now. > > Building up all the testing framewoork is really great. I have no opinions > about the license related stuff but all other changes generally look good to > me. OK I am going to send a v8 shortly with the changes from folks addressed. I'm going to trim the Cc list considerbly for that v8 as the list is already quite large and I think it may appear as spam to some lists, I'll drop the copyleft-next folks as hopefully the license stuff is out of the way. Luis