From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7538C04AAC for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 11:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9637420675 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 11:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732368AbfETLKs (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 07:10:48 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:57154 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730634AbfETLKs (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 07:10:48 -0400 Received: from konferenz-8d46b998.on.site.uni-stuttgart.net ([141.70.185.152]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hSgBp-0004k0-S9; Mon, 20 May 2019 13:10:46 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 13:10:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Steve Winslow cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 06/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190519135130.462579320@linutronix.de> <20190519154041.143362410@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 19 May 2019, Steve Winslow wrote: > Same comment here as for patch 16: the additional all-caps disclaimer > paragraph in the middle (beginning with "THIS SOFTWARE IS > PROVIDED...") appears to come from a BSD-style license, not GPL. I'm > not sure this disclaimer should be deleted and replaced by just a > standard GPL-2.0-or-later tag. Right. Did some archaeology. This thing seems to originate from TI, via RidgeRun Inc. and then proliferated by Monta Vista and others. Thanks, tglx