From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE4AC04AB5 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B2826A32 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="W73wZSO7"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=lohutok.net header.i=@lohutok.net header.b="h62r7lPD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726878AbfFCSif (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:38:35 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:60822 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726843AbfFCSie (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:38:34 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C800C15555C; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:38:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to:cc :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=DDbypbJ5ncbC 6kJjINriEYEdGro=; b=W73wZSO7Ns4xrWLqKY77ll8rW0VtWtpL3xZ9wUHn+jF2 abLieLhkEM1lN2dcqLVjfBCyd4VVFxxMnBnKxsYdVG3/V8yN5ClhaakSyoBVAAN1 YgSmDgPODYR8SINJnk33L1ZPQ6Owq6W8icm75XmbQdoJpiyyM0fri0Ni93PaWp0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C101C15555B; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:38:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lohutok.net; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2018-11.pbsmtp; bh=pquzrIR9D2pMidZWDUe1T5GLVYS5liXqnvyZg9WwGKQ=; b=h62r7lPDxAFXZv2SEnyeUHXE0Ek1huORhGh7X1QwnVUbxeGWWGGxMEJrFMfR8yZzZRQFnhA9iu9d8dgdwGZHJ8f6eYGMQntKgjj4IXaVDVlSMlW2woEEn7WVqOP2jV/5KduguuOFNdtXOLgW5H85VfXRWpUiLtAVJ7UCeQlKmsk= Received: from [10.0.0.75] (unknown [24.47.52.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28E4715555A; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [Batch 16 patch 24/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 249 To: Greg KH , "Zavras, Alexios" Cc: "linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org" References: <20190602204441.312079455@linutronix.de> <20190602204655.193235946@linutronix.de> <27E3B830FA35C7429A77DAEEDEB734477E3FEC3B@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <20190603180349.GA19359@kroah.com> From: Allison Randal Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:38:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190603180349.GA19359@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C9BE01C2-862E-11E9-8A84-72EEE64BB12D-44123303!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 6/3/19 2:03 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:58:27PM +0000, Zavras, Alexios wrote: >>> >>> Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): >>> >>> as all part of the linux kernel this file is gpl >>> >>> extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier >>> >>> GPL-2.0-only >>> >>> has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4 file(s). [...] >> No license version specified and not even a reference to COPYING. > > The Linux kernel is GPLv2 only, so I would agree with this identifier > change. Might be worth holding for review, but I agree with the change as-is. Reviewed-by: Allison Randal