linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Walls <awalls-Xoej9cPu4Z+RGvkDC/A1pg@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Torvalds
	<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	ivtv-devel-jGorlIydJmRM656bX5wj8A@public.gmane.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kthread_worker: reimplement flush_kthread_work() to allow freeing the work item being executed
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:46:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342990015.2487.19.camel@palomino.walls.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120722164953.GC5144-RcKxWJ4Cfj1J2suj2OqeGauc2jM2gXBXkQQo+JxHRPFibQn6LdNjmg@public.gmane.org>

On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 09:49 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:20:06PM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
> > > +	worker->current_work = work;
> > >  	spin_unlock_irq(&worker->lock);
> > >  
> > >  	if (work) {
> > >  		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > >  		work->func(work);
> > 
> > If the call to 'work->func(work);' frees the memory pointed to by
> > 'work', 'worker->current_work' points to deallocated memory.
> > So 'worker->current_work' will only ever used as a unique 'work'
> > identifier to handle, correct?
> 
> Yeah.  flush_kthread_work(@work) which can only be called if @work is
> known to be alive looks at the pointer to determine whether it's the
> current work item on the worker.

OK.  Thanks.

Hmmm, I didn't know about the constraint about 'known to be alive' in
the other email I just sent.

That might make calling flush_kthread_work() hard for a user to use, if
the user lets the work get freed by another thread executing the work.


> > >  void flush_kthread_work(struct kthread_work *work)
> > >  {
> > > -	int seq = work->queue_seq;
> > > +	struct kthread_flush_work fwork = {
> > > +		KTHREAD_WORK_INIT(fwork.work, kthread_flush_work_fn),
> > > +		COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(fwork.done),
> > > +	};
> > > +	struct kthread_worker *worker;
> > > +	bool noop = false;
> > > +
> > 
> > You might want a check for 'work == NULL' here, to gracefully handle
> > code like the following:

> workqueue's flush_work() doesn't allow %NULL pointer.  I don't want to
> make the behaviors deviate and don't see much point in changing
> workqueue's behavior at this point.

OK.  Fair enough.

Thanks.

Regards,
Andy



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-22 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-19 21:15 [PATCHSET] kthread_worker: reimplement flush_kthread_work() to allow freeing during execution Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <20120719211510.GA32763-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-19 21:15   ` [PATCH 1/2] kthread_worker: reorganize to prepare for flush_kthread_work() reimplementation Tejun Heo
2012-07-21 17:13     ` Andy Walls
2012-07-22 16:46       ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]         ` <20120722164607.GB5144-RcKxWJ4Cfj1J2suj2OqeGauc2jM2gXBXkQQo+JxHRPFibQn6LdNjmg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-22 20:42           ` Andy Walls
2012-07-22 17:22     ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-07-19 21:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] kthread_worker: reimplement flush_kthread_work() to allow freeing the work item being executed Tejun Heo
     [not found]   ` <20120719211629.GC32763-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-21 18:20     ` Andy Walls
     [not found]       ` <1342894814.2504.31.camel-xioobY1GIEhKttHedORAlB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-22 16:49         ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]           ` <20120722164953.GC5144-RcKxWJ4Cfj1J2suj2OqeGauc2jM2gXBXkQQo+JxHRPFibQn6LdNjmg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-22 20:46             ` Andy Walls [this message]
2012-07-23 17:12               ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]                 ` <20120723171215.GA5776-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-24 11:17                   ` Andy Walls
2012-07-22 20:39   ` Andy Walls
2012-09-14 22:50 ` [PATCHSET] kthread_worker: reimplement flush_kthread_work() to allow freeing during execution Colin Cross
2012-09-17 19:40   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-17 20:28     ` Greg KH
     [not found]       ` <20120917202850.GA18910-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-28  0:19         ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1342990015.2487.19.camel@palomino.walls.org \
    --to=awalls-xoej9cpu4z+rgvkdc/a1pg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ivtv-devel-jGorlIydJmRM656bX5wj8A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).