Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: update bindings for MT8192 SoC

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: update bindings for MT8192 SoC

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 210 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:48:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
> From: "leilk.liu" <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>
> 
> Add a DT binding documentation for the MT8192 soc.

I'd expect to see a matching driver patch.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: update bindings for MT8192 SoC

[lei liu]

On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 10:48 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:48:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
> > From: "leilk.liu" <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Add a DT binding documentation for the MT8192 soc.
> 
> I'd expect to see a matching driver patch.

OK,I'll send patch v2. Thanks.

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: update bindings for MT8192 SoC

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/07/2020 11:48, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:48:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
>> From: "leilk.liu" <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>
>>
>> Add a DT binding documentation for the MT8192 soc.
> 
> I'd expect to see a matching driver patch.
> 

Well for now the device would match against the "mediatek,mt6765-spi" as it is 
the same chip. We just want to define the binding so that we could add a special 
case for mt8192 in the future, if needed.

Regards,
Matthias

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: update bindings for MT8192 SoC

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:48:19 +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
> Add a DT binding documentation for the MT8192 soc.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: update bindings for MT8192 SoC
      commit: 30962fe33ab5ed4bbd78c12f4b9e25a85c3e8d0b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark