From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jassi brar Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH 0/5] spi-imx: some updates Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:47:17 +0900 Message-ID: <1b68c6790912081647p39f0b285q2c164ab41c673aeb@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091208211258.GA13706@pengutronix.de> <20091208153239.af0b5bb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Andrew Morton , David Brownell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Mack , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Grant Likely Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > 2009/12/8 Andrew Morton : >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 22:12:58 +0100 >> Uwe Kleine-K__nig wrote: >> >>> this series depends on "spi: drain MXC SPI transfer buffer when pro= bing >>> device" which is currently in -mm and also included in my spi-imx b= ranch >>> (see below). =C2=A0IMHO at least my first patch should go into .33 = as it >>> fixes an oops. >> >> I queued all five for 2.6.33. > > I had also picked up "drain MXC SPI transfer..." into my next-spi tre= e > earlier today. =C2=A0After a few days I'll send Linus a pull request.= =C2=A0I > just need to make sure that Ben's tree gets pulled first because I've > got other stuff in there depending on it. > >> Once I've merged up the current -mm patch queue: > [... list of patches snipped ...] >> I shall stop sending SPI patches to Linus. =C2=A0I'll send any which= I >> accumulate to Grant instead. > > I'm new to the job, so I'm being cautions about which things I'm pick > up. =C2=A0However, I'll happily merge anything that Andrew says is ok= ay. > Andrew, when in the merge window do you typically send out patch > queues? > Grant, may I know of your tree, if it's public? thanks