From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Blackfin on-chip SPI controller driver updates and bug-fixing Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:54:19 -0700 Message-ID: <200710301354.19440.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1193735885-8202-1-git-send-email-bryan.wu@analog.com> <8bd0f97a0710301329i8a21b22ncc9f71a81bc06543@mail.gmail.com> <200710301342.18559.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Bryan Wu , spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Mike Frysinger" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200710301342.18559.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 30 October 2007, David Brownell wrote: > > = > > was there something that caught your eye other than the ugly udelay() > > you mentioned in the other thread ? > = > That one was a feature that might be more generally necessary, > just to meet chip timing specs. =A0Mostly they're no trouble. > = ... although I note that the referenced thread suggested maybe the problem there was a missing pullup on the chipselect line. If that was really the cause, then I think that feature would best be left out of the framework. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/