From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev: Use separate TX and RX bounce buffers Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:07:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20141013110726.GT27755@sirena.org.uk> References: <1412878765-29088-1-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="80FmgzPrdF8O9k7o" Cc: linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, JD Zheng , Scott Branden , Geert Uytterhoeven To: Ray Jui Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1412878765-29088-1-git-send-email-rjui-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: --80FmgzPrdF8O9k7o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:19:25AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > By using separate TX and RX bounce buffers, we avoid potential cache > flush and invalidation sequence issue that may be encountered when a > single bounce buffer is shared between TX and RX Applied, thanks. --80FmgzPrdF8O9k7o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUO7JtAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQczgH/33EOoph6nnr17oswSdKgMe0 V1ToWcU3XovTDlHV0uVcZqfpdOAMzXfcz4xd5gB2si2rrVfDlDwgYVyVgGG41FJo m8nVSg43dBwcKmf07se2gF2JHRQeZShDktoD/1pIrHWmBhZj7ZXxw/lrVZ1kEh/7 f4MgJPC8CVuQ7kWMr3vO18fY4ZLhySD5Lj4NYysl0euxhzzc22xFxxDyXD4LJeMz n/bYmW+aNg5OVpHoxfYg27W0TGmLcUscmJDTqELFS6+XaBqq7kQhUXOT7h4pHQpL 2QBu80OMCf89MfUBg7E4e75kttQ47azCxHHWTXEh3sQBrA7gKfAWsi3B0GF7orE= =rRC8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --80FmgzPrdF8O9k7o-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html