On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 02:54:33PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> > would be very unusual?  Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> > to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> > If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> > problems...

> The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
> platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
> DaVinci devices using legacy booting.

Ugh, you still have legacy platforms :(

> > In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.

> I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.

I guess.