From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: dspi: Provide support for DSPI slave mode operation (Vybryd vf610) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:12:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20190204141200.05802849@jawa> References: <20180927150709.17010-1-lukma@denx.de> <20190109082644.14941-1-lukma@denx.de> <20190204113001.77d59570@jawa> <20190204105737.GE23441@sirena.org.uk> <20190204135242.7112d48c@jawa> <20190204130356.GF23441@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Esben Haabendal , Martin =?UTF-8?B?SHVuZGViw7hsbA==?= , Andrey Smirnov To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190204130356.GF23441@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org --Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:52:42PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:30:01AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: =20 >=20 > > > You've been sending ARM: patches to me (the SPI maintainer) and > > > one of the DT maintainers. =20 >=20 > ... >=20 > > Moreover, I've CC'ed developers (Esben, Andrey, Martin) involved in > > the changes for previous work done in this file/driver. =20 >=20 > > And those changes are solely related to SPI work in this driver, no > > ARM Vybrid. =20 >=20 > If they're SPI patches they should have a changelog that looks like a > SPI patch which means that it should start with "spi" (see other > patches on the list or git log for examples). When your patch > subject lines start with ARM: that means they are for arch/arm - I > don't 100% know but I suspect I've just not got far enough into the > mails to notice that they're for SPI, people do send a lot of patches > that just happen to mention buses to maintainers for those buses. In > general you should try to make sure that the subject line for your > patch matches the style used in the relevant subsystem. I see. Thanks for the detailed explanation. >=20 > > What else shall I do? =20 >=20 > You'll need to resend the patch, preferrably with a suitable subject > line. I will resend the patch with more suitable subject, no problem. Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de --Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEgAyFJ+N6uu6+XupJAR8vZIA0zr0FAlxYOiAACgkQAR8vZIA0 zr1MUwgA1g32KfI4g0bWQvIMTLGQl+Jp5F79SQbORRROkIuthN+bsLuSKHB1vBTy psXYERmEDkKzXnDseu8bPGOJnWX/X+xAjJVJWofNs45CfWVfekdD6/9SEKizi5NZ pdalPfUr+91F4RFt05INqh2ZjuH1pGyCfVqvszo3z7DrUAEyon3ADaeedAHVA8Aq 4woJ+Rnhz40nnqErV8T2rM75jt1UGpJ8/GoX4d5wJYIuR4bnNp3T08A3BWBM4bc1 5Em7TpzxsGeGL+oYTxG3FvBrY4J1l9tQtY+Ewzkf80Wj9N+EK5hUW43L2h6KwIDK aJql+tP6AV37pL1iMcXAHDAS40N9Ug== =1VQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq--