From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Applied "spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay_exec` helper" to the spi tree Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:12:24 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <20191015111224.A83BD27419E4@ypsilon.sirena.org.uk> References: <20190926105147.7839-11-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> Cc: baolin.wang@linaro.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, broonie@kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, jic23@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , orsonzhai@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com To: Alexandru Ardelean Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190926105147.7839-11-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org The patch spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay_exec` helper has been applied to the spi tree at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-5.5 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >>From cd13152bce34cd71f560a7c4a8f66096f2445984 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandru Ardelean Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:51:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay_exec` helper The tegra114 driver has a weird/separate `tegra_spi_transfer_delay()` function that does 2 delays: one mdelay() and one udelay(). This was introduced via commit f4fade12d506e14867a2b0a5e2f7aaf227297d8b ("spi/tegra114: Correct support for cs_change"). There doesn't seem to be a mention in that commit message to suggest a specific need/use-case for having the 2 delay calls. For the most part, udelay() should be sufficient. This change replaces it with the new `spi_transfer_delay_exec()`, which should do the same thing. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190926105147.7839-11-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c | 17 +++-------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c index 39374c2edcf3..8133dc49d34f 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c @@ -984,17 +984,6 @@ static int tegra_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) return 0; } -static void tegra_spi_transfer_delay(int delay) -{ - if (!delay) - return; - - if (delay >= 1000) - mdelay(delay / 1000); - - udelay(delay % 1000); -} - static void tegra_spi_transfer_end(struct spi_device *spi) { struct tegra_spi_data *tspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); @@ -1098,7 +1087,7 @@ static int tegra_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master, complete_xfer: if (ret < 0 || skip) { tegra_spi_transfer_end(spi); - tegra_spi_transfer_delay(xfer->delay_usecs); + spi_transfer_delay_exec(xfer); goto exit; } else if (list_is_last(&xfer->transfer_list, &msg->transfers)) { @@ -1106,11 +1095,11 @@ static int tegra_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master, tspi->cs_control = spi; else { tegra_spi_transfer_end(spi); - tegra_spi_transfer_delay(xfer->delay_usecs); + spi_transfer_delay_exec(xfer); } } else if (xfer->cs_change) { tegra_spi_transfer_end(spi); - tegra_spi_transfer_delay(xfer->delay_usecs); + spi_transfer_delay_exec(xfer); } } -- 2.20.1