From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13922C433DF for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C79206C3 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:13:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591269208; bh=Nbi1Vwcd5pL6Yj4orLCRo0b8veuEtH1O87IQWqOBnuw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=UjSalEeyqZ4LD1fMtDyU/olg9oi2eptMiDfFDJndVQAGROFHBo+8taH3AlQoxVvA5 VSk/DnFw6RzFXBZfQOs7b8NtnpXhdncmUvUXPlfe2RDSdDiDdCnfOKeNArx5WCNkJE Uo7qvwBxobwMlyhY0OIKI4fJwL2kvJR2OLkFt5OM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726026AbgFDLN2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:13:28 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56366 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725904AbgFDLN2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:13:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3429A206A2; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:13:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591269207; bh=Nbi1Vwcd5pL6Yj4orLCRo0b8veuEtH1O87IQWqOBnuw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QgWPc37BTO8K8KgGK1UajZ4b1MCZp4/zWB7ShZWgSgr3nnMQE0L8sIsE/S0nbnzO9 lrtYt89a2iu+JABD68eS4UqgsyTh/wUvkBWpj0b++mqrOOKdpoabFEnSaaEV4A8b0+ t0TNMpIQtA+hTVfAFtQJ+iUK8E4prnVk+GlFKm1o= Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:13:25 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lukas Wunner Cc: Florian Fainelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..." , "open list:SPI SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , Martin Sperl Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: bcm2711: Update SPI nodes compatible strings Message-ID: <20200604111325.GC6644@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200604034655.15930-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20200604034655.15930-3-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20200604042038.jzolu6k7q3d6bsvq@wunner.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H8ygTp4AXg6deix2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200604042038.jzolu6k7q3d6bsvq@wunner.de> X-Cookie: VMS version 2.0 ==> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-spi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 06:20:38AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:46:54PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > The BCM2711 SoC features 5 SPI controllers which all share the same > > interrupt line, the SPI driver needs to support interrupt sharing, > > therefore use the chip specific compatible string to help with that. > You're saying above that the 5 controllers all share the interrupt > but below you're only changing the compatible string of 4 controllers. > So I assume spi0 still has its own interrupt and only the additional > 4 controllers present on the BCM2711/BCM7211 share their interrupt? Regardless of what's going on with the interrupts the compatible string should reflect the IP version so unless for some reason someone taped out two different versions of the IP it seems odd that the compatible strings would vary within a given SoC. --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl7Y11QACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BJoQf9E2n8uWIZEAGBfspqHbovoYPVluN+kh7+8y5BKxaA1Wz41xV3hGzU3Wzl gEH2zebNk9eIG8IUALFCgrMLhlRBwBVV5D4LB5dVMvuwNWDeJOUs3cgBVuI8cd83 +avoXuMxBVRfhlC6JnUGrqHFPwpdBrcmfOK51jkDqZfoLdlm/ICsnWQBJPsfYTE1 iunoxY5P1vldrejYbghjoIn5OgtfDDV52cH68De5WX9srhWs8pwI+ZyXNmwuHt7d FStC87OY8PDFPkpoF3wpmfF2BQPpzbn/b//Hyco7fg+NUJ+hMFNynSn+tcp5fgYB R1ryNcVXhixXytOvVz7v7fBb8AtCxw== =gHMp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2--