On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:12:28PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 16:10, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > It's a bit unusual to need to actually free the IRQ over suspend -
> > what's driving that requirement here?

> clk_disable_unprepare(dspi->clk); is driving the requirement - same as
> in dspi_remove case, the module will fault when its registers are
> accessed without a clock.

I see - this could be fixed by having the interrupt handler bounce the
clock on, there's a little overhead from that but hopefully not too
much.  That should also help with the remove case I guess so long as the
clock is registered before the interrupt is requested?