From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCAAC63697 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C558620A8B for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726898AbgKMPrC (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:47:02 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37904 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726777AbgKMPqo (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:46:44 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05B7ABD9; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:46:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne To: chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] spi: Add generic SPI multiplexer Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:46:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20201113154633.21542-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20200204032838.20739-3-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> References: <20200204032838.20739-3-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Upon registering spi-mux's devices through spi_add_device() the kernel gets stuck waiting for the 'spi_add_lock' mutex to be released. The mutex happens to be held by spi-mux's parent SPI bus, which unluckily, is waiting for spi-mux's probe to finish before releasing it. I might aswell be doing something wrong. But so far I trust my DT implementation: &spi { status = "okay"; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_gpio7>; spi@0 { compatible = "spi-mux"; reg = <0>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; spi-max-frequency = <100000000>; mux-controls = <&gpio_mux>; w5500@0 { compatible = "wiznet,w5500"; reg = <0>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <ð1_pins>; interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; interrupts = <27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; spi-max-frequency = <30000000>; }; spi-flash@1 { compatible = "jedec,spi-nor"; reg = <1>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; spi-max-frequency = <16000000>; }; }; }; Regards, Nicolas