On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:09:32AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:

> I did take a look by running git log on 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/ and there is no single style 
> being used. Using "dt-bindings: spi:" is a popular choice. Some other 
> commits just use "spi:". And then some use "spi: dt-bindings:". The last 
> commit to touch cadence-quadspi.txt (fcebca39938f) used the prefix 
> "dt-bindings: spi:".

Yes, lots of people pick unfortunate subject lines for DT patches - that
doesn't mean it's good.  I'm looking to see spi: same as for all other
SPI patches.

> So on the prefix front I think the subject is good enough. Of course, if 
> you have any other preference then it can be re-worded but let's first 
> be clear on what the expectation is. And then let's make sure to apply 
> it to all future patches uniformly. This way future contributors won't 
> have to take a guess on what the expected prefix is.

I do edit some percentage of patches, but some do slip through for
various reasons.  There's also some things that just get completely
missed, especially if there isn't also a code patch nearby.

> Apart from the prefix is there anything else to improve? IMHO the 
> subject is good enough but I'm open to suggestions.

There was the thing with constraints.