From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frode Isaksen Subject: Re: Applied "spi: davinci: enable DMA when channels are defined in DT" to the spi tree Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:24:43 +0100 Message-ID: <8ba9a2e0-6666-958f-b5a7-b73b047bb6ac@baylibre.com> References: <11df78f1-7b4e-5093-f166-b3af21c03abc@baylibre.com> <20170308124316.56vn2qijllu6mi3v@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fabien Parent , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, ptitiano@baylibre.com, khilman@baylibre.com To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170308124316.56vn2qijllu6mi3v@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On 08/03/2017 13:43, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:35:02AM +0100, Frode Isaksen wrote: > >> To avoid data corruption issues with UBIFS volume over SPI NOR, DMA should not be used for vmalloc'ed buffers. The 5'th patch in my series fixes that: > It's best to always try to ensure that your patch serieses are > bisectable... My wrong - do you want me to re-submit the patch series with the the last patch in the series that really enabled DMA ? Thanks, Frode