From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAE0C4332F for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 21:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230098AbiJEVAe (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 17:00:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52464 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230029AbiJEVAd (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 17:00:33 -0400 Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72F7A80F5E; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DAA58042F; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 17:00:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Oct 2022 17:00:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1665003629; x=1665007229; bh=TsI02B3sVh QFKOVk9keaf6ReQTAWUpnqUMBU0gDCsKo=; b=ZfXYeIiQfqotQD9UYVd1ADllex ZcKI/ME+E8BnDEeC7Uyk0EfebWGcsqBgfUwspGkHnUYF/5yqAmHMWbmDFnfEOqSl Af2L5RjStJdNCf16q9UC/sXQ3Z45+wV0IniaMQaj14s1KxRlR/yej+tdp5Cxkre6 JmenQyIcjlLYjczhbeEOflo2DxRCIehNXukUDSklJQSwkNt9QpdjxUnEHSl/PigD W3urFP4w/03Szc8AIyLlnye0c2gPRv8Rqzx6NmSKcpO98VT9+gvNbEGzqqVsVAKB tIR/55XxKHTlzanIxwooyWcaqYgAMqwQHvPv1k8PmmGyvVsS/GHYTSD+Decw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1665003629; x=1665007229; bh=TsI02B3sVhQFKOVk9keaf6ReQTAW UpnqUMBU0gDCsKo=; b=LUSBUNMySfpRFCaT3bDv2jAXpEbZTjVcfi/fzv/VOWTy sy/lpl/u07TOPIHmvqOnQuuuaKqvu43M5WLlMSpSomYPnzbIAgpEZ4d2D9wdTQSk Cwy/9jq6L4ICcHDEIiu6Dy1YdIJWwGIkAGicFOnSvb/GfXqxzoaBKTG8FDIJedHI YRC21dnKN8H8iiCMm3/CiRD4C5jAk4UqPLg7ilF11mQnRWQ6Lpoe30Fkyg4JyO/K Uh49Nx0qGQnyB3KMLzs9usanQ9uuu6lafuSIgVtiBjoRrGtf1xJvY2PGWJaaRYbG plgELycl+0Fki2ZtrarjXlDlyai45qpp74otDle/1A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeifedgudehhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdet rhhnugcuuegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeffheeugeetiefhgeethfejgfdtuefggeejleehjeeutefhfeeggefhkedt keetffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe grrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 27340B60089; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 17:00:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1015-gaf7d526680-fm-20220929.001-gaf7d5266 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <9527fd97-41d1-4f68-aa9e-8a4424fa94f1@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20220728161459.7738-1-nick.hawkins@hpe.com> <20220728161459.7738-4-nick.hawkins@hpe.com> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 23:00:07 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Hawkins, Nick" , "Mark Brown" Cc: "Rob Herring" , "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" , "Verdun, Jean-Marie" , "Russell King" , "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] ARM: dts: hpe: Add spi driver node Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 10:33 PM, Hawkins, Nick wrote: > > Was there a particular issue with this patch? I just realized that > patches 1,2, and 5 were accepted but not 3 or 4. It looks like you sent the patch to a lot of people, without addressing anyone in particular. I certainly did not expect to pick it up like this. When you resend the missing patches after 6.1-rc1, please send the ones you want to be merged through the soc tree to:soc@kernel.org, with reviewers and mailing lists on Cc, but nobody else as the recipient. For the SoC tree, I usually have separate branches for code changes (usually just Kconfig and MAINTAINERS entries in case of arm64), devicetree changes, defconfig changes and driver (typically drivers/soc, but could be others that have no separate subsystem maintainers), so ideally you send a set of patches or a pull request for each such topic branch. Arnd