From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] dt-bindings: spi: support non-spi bindings as SPI slaves Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:24:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20200315134416.16527-1-sam@ravnborg.org> <20200315134416.16527-3-sam@ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Alexandre Courbot , Andrzej Hajda , Brian Masney , Chris Zhong , Douglas Anderson , Guido Gunther , Heiko Schocher , Nikolaus Schaller , Hoegeun Kwon , Jagan Teki , Jerry Han , Jonathan Bakker , Laurent Pinchart , Lin Huang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200315134416.16527-3-sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 2:44 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Independent bindings can be SPI slaves which for example is > the case for several panel bindings. > > Move SPI slave properties to spi-slave.yaml so the independent > SPI slave bindings can include spi-slave.yaml rather than > duplicating the properties. To me it seems like you are creating the common SPI slave bindings? Maybe the commit message should be about that. > + reg: > + minimum: 0 > + maximum: 256 255? Or am I wrong? Apart from that it looks good to me. Yours, Linus Walleij