From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Abraham Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:17:27 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1342021265-11212-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <20120711174908.GP3938@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, kgene.kim@samsung.com, jaswinder.singh@linaro.org To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On 11 July 2012 23:30, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On 11 July 2012 23:19, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: >>> Changes since v4: >>> - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio as suggested >>> by Mark Brown. >> >> These looked OK (and have had quite a bit of review already so we're >> probably at the stage where incremental fixes are better anyway) so I >> tried to apply them but git am was really unhappy. I tried applying on >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git spi-next >> >> and -next. Can you check what's going on here please? > > These patches were based on Samsung maintainer's for-next branch with > Grant's spi/next branch merged. I will check with your spi-next > branch. Thanks. The 6th patch in this series has a dependency on Samsung maintainers