On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:54:32AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 6:56 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:

> > +#define get_dev_from_fwnode(fwnode)    get_device((fwnode)->dev)

> I think it is better to not have this wrapper. We want it to be clear
> when we're acquiring a ref. I know get_device() does that, but I have
> to look up what get_dev_from_fwnode() does exactly.

Or perhaps calling it get_device_from_fwnode() would make it more
obvious that it is a get_device() variant?