From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akash Asthana Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] spi: spi-qcom-qspi: Add interconnect support Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:05:42 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1584105134-13583-1-git-send-email-akashast@codeaurora.org> <1584105134-13583-8-git-send-email-akashast@codeaurora.org> <20200314005817.GN144492@google.com> <3aeb3083-2a31-b269-510d-eb608ff14ce5@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , wsa@the-dreams.de, Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Stephen Boyd , Manu Gautam , linux-arm-msm , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson , Georgi Djakov To: Evan Green Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Hi Evan, >> IIUC, you meant to say struct icc_req(inside icc_path) will be saving >> avg_bw and peak_bw so no need to save it outside icc_path? > Correct, it seems silly to store the same set of values twice in the > framework, but with different semantics about who's watching it. > -Evan Thanks for clarification! Yeah make sense not to introduce the structure in ICC framework Regards, Akash -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,\na Linux Foundation Collaborative Project