From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f44.google.com (mail-ed1-f44.google.com [209.85.208.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4145A3FC0 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f44.google.com with SMTP id j13so59897524edv.13 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:14:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p5az8nB81DwwNgXGTxU9ukK7VAEPLsys0uqjmS5Tnv4=; b=jY0gnQxKtfoHLReTbt5tv1J2b8p8UMD4UpXbJp0u5T/PV/r2z8u48dBkTvV0gO2ZUj /LiRt0DewGx4DPgmtD9+lIe1x/4dwr373259WBlybTWGt3Cnak+l+YEqXN7M0zfMDVu1 3azCzuk3zNEQsRoI3yw4RP8eDTEvdNFSqu2fat4MGWc1AgALPC3gX24prJgVHA6pnBVT 0TqkiKPjyJvdwTDu82RbawjQQFASYTeToMas16awrm9Mbq0RnbIg42i8XFIyNmJlknzG UBQvzrvQNW+qzeAX0yuWvDRMEU8AdfIZyNRPEHRnHzjPFYi865bxQtw6vj5DFpvj3LXo a5rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p5az8nB81DwwNgXGTxU9ukK7VAEPLsys0uqjmS5Tnv4=; b=bdHzoqjMgq0b8x9CUS/I36ykjNdBdLoVhKx1wyLnh3dAXacR5O6PHtGBC1zaZXAPVt Gd5NrI8/wYDAJQ8MLMv59JgelC6Rs0QIEx6kFm22dBPl2Kuu8JToXSormwLeEDsq61Pt W8fB/elZrDyKIl02B+fctUf9fdfzg3CSVMFVkdV+wefLTS4VRQQ1rukA8/7STu4XOEkQ C5IV7GItBjq6+OKC93jyCNGS4/TippMiekqNgPEvOUvOdpGG536XzZxxMR1iWJnMrU7b pCtIfBntI8pzXb/kP+FR9hFNZFaPctaySceBtTt0oMy/JCbxKbYXx+u/5r8geKXodvRu OioQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532F757RL5zPw768WRa4ndePLw9x0w/ht7SPHWh4SYrb+qoHXoSK NnICG+ARc2NDY0Xo2EpJC4o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw69bCPeGc+pArhaAIB76bErwEstQbaX/JKGGqb00nLLe4X/r85yGsdukQFaixTebA+OUxOhg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c2cf:: with SMTP id ch15mr27480613ejb.107.1632136438450; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (host-79-47-104-104.retail.telecomitalia.it. [79.47.104.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id la1sm6020197ejc.48.2021.09.20.04.13.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:13:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" To: Saurav Girepunje , Greg KH Cc: saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, phil@philpotter.co.uk, straube.linux@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: core: remove the function power_saving_wk_hdl Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:13:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1651026.4NJzAxWbHA@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: References: <45c4de06-f618-4352-91ea-885edecdf8bb@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday, September 20, 2021 12:36:06 PM CEST Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:52:50PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote: > > > > > > On 13/09/21 9:48 pm, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:24:39PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote: > > > > Remove the function power_saving_wk_hdl() as it just calling > > > > the rtw_ps_processor().Instead of power_saving_wk_hdl() call directly > > > > rtw_ps_processor(). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje > > > > > > [] > > > > > > Also does not apply to my tree. Please rebase against my staging-next > > > branch and resend. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > I always do rebase against your staging-testing branch. Can you help me to > > understand.When we need to rebase on staging-next. Do we always need to > > rebase against staging-next..! > > Yes, you should. When you are working on code that lots of other people > are working on, there will be conflicts like this, and you just need to > stay on top of it. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Sorry, Greg. I'm confused... :( As far as I know, everyone here make patches for staging-testing. You apply them to staging-testing first and, about 24 hours later, you merge them into staging-next. In fact I receive two distinct messages, one after the other, when you apply to staging-testing and then to staging-next. This is the what I've always done here and you haven't ever asked me to rebase against staging-next... So, why are you asking for doing that rebase on staging-next to Saurav? Thanks, Fabio