From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oi1-f177.google.com (mail-oi1-f177.google.com [209.85.167.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F08E572 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f177.google.com with SMTP id h9so2868184oih.4 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RWVAxqbt2ragLnej0S2guhkFqxl9f5X2TG9vofPgr5g=; b=pIK5I0OJGNcUZKY6fYRPbWFjK/lbB/dhyRXSbbm+CTTMFSRjrlWjvL5G5XGfbhX3K6 CGKXNujPs93Tr1f+duXmLRro7Rtvvd3PeoeSAXXamUOCFow3NZdJtOCk5nQkQ2yerRhJ lAX7VU/YBPjMjMeh1RioPTnUaliC6N+lg0eaH0xWmF9VxYspJTWHZjWx1kX9HAPNSlMQ 33kL5izgAkE9rx0Rp6qUuU8yFyE8JEVfvqBSI5MjHgAdwniQ7cKoSUlr/71XclJ92/G3 A13Bxker1PmlMbws/jkuzEZs0rumjVtvDPb5kh1183ZsbwmdsA971Gu2+kYYPbWqqoes 5fdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RWVAxqbt2ragLnej0S2guhkFqxl9f5X2TG9vofPgr5g=; b=toggkUhDgbyUZFyEMl8j53dAbMDxgtypcTzXUgF2KeKdEYVVKfHM/JTGuX3zZxttR5 b+IEIpLUVn+BJdb/7UgvMJcHh0jjkGKZYU43CiQeVkFAwaxk1T5Gn7utTnzxhiPqae+5 0S+qwYOeIBP53iS3Z2O8PxPafDtg6LlMT/sSz2RErgSGQBZ2Ubq0GqH//FrlXyRXTsEJ apjLuBDmTE0wAychWIRag6bfaJxv+hCGahL0yeW2zyxLxkRALwTyeMZV6X11G5i98BLn mSG5oCZ62dfMYuIToKWPWpvLckG/e2mogeOmA8jfQmjng8dECdQRsk9w0+5THacifHfh nVkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533olDPh0HQ7kiEt0uhTkDQ8u56RtyCW5D9uxL5qUMVjg7+RPg/8 Kc39C1cPfmQthrDeojsL44alc1bU9YhSMw47YAc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9W8YmUacJHRTLRKCSRcE6AT1Zu3kRNDtCEpiYsKWDEmet6F863hn0P5W2iDFQ+YX04vhuiOFjMdEZ014wjcU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:244:: with SMTP id m4mr3971937oie.37.1622644813198; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210602133659.46158-1-manikishanghantasala@gmail.com> <9a3878fd-3b59-76f5-ddc7-625c66f9fee8@ieee.org> In-Reply-To: From: Manikishan Ghantasala Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:09:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: fixed the coding style, labels should not be indented. To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Alex Elder , Rui Miguel Silva , Johan Hovold , Alex Elder , greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Greg, Thanks for the clarification. Regards, Manikishan Ghantasala On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 20:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 07:57:35PM +0530, Manikishan Ghantasala wrote: > > Sending this mail again as I missed to reply to all. > > Hi Alex, > > > > I agree those are called bit-field member names rather than labels. > > But the reason I mentioned is because the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl > > gave out a warning saying "labels should not be indented". > > checkpatch is a perl script that does it's best, but does not always get > it right. In this case, it is incorrect, the existing code is just > fine. > > thanks, > > greg k-h