From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A65372 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACCE860FE6; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:15:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1630574154; bh=dPw6G1yVOra8rqEBvFu7lWMDGR3IWQFgtT1jvbbgnNM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=URutCE4KcIzFWRrXltEliCz1MNdQ7Hhhqk+ZzrDXLHKpoOzXyL5ugAk4AWL2vrzmd v3zdkB0m8gN3PLf+MOuHkLNdXOMknoif29QRJKNEH8ktAmtVfKWm/IxEPQ9VhXx6Wu kng2BzSy7Hqw1snV8Lg5Mx9PkHtUpQaINBGlx0WM= Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:15:51 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Sergio Paracuellos Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Bjorn Helgaas , Matthias Brugger , "open list:MIPS" , linux-pci , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, NeilBrown , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: mt7621-pci: set end limit for 'ioport_resource' Message-ID: References: <20210822161005.22467-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> <20210822161005.22467-4-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 05:14:27PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:01 AM Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > We have increase IO_SPACE_LIMIT for ralink platform to get PCI IO resources > > > properly handled using PCI core APIs. To align those changes with driver > > > code we have to set 'ioport_resource' end limit to IO_SPACE_LIMIT to avoid > > > errors. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Thanks. Since I am planning to move 'mt7621-pci' from staging to > 'drivers/pci/controller' and send v3 after the next merge window, I > prefer this patch to go through the staging tree. For the other two I > don't have any preference and it is ok for me to go through mips or > pci trees. So, Bjorn and Thomas is up to you if you are ok with the > changes. Yes, I would need acks for the other patches in the series if this is to come through the staging tree. thanks, greg k-h