From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0033.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3136D13 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08AC18021C87 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omf15.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A83180F3243; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 30F93C417C; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Match parentheses alignment From: Joe Perches To: Alex Elder , Greg KH , Zhansaya Bagdauletkyzy Cc: johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, Dwaipayan Ray Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:29:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1607b040-6bc4-9a58-ae81-4ea0adf5885d@ieee.org> References: <20210406124259.GA96537@zhans> <7d7be8bcc0e80d826083890ed7791070ad25e603.camel@perches.com> <1607b040-6bc4-9a58-ae81-4ea0adf5885d@ieee.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 30F93C417C X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.10 X-Stat-Signature: qxmpd7uwx1trgicc8moxoesttq4xqzoj X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout04 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+1NzsPGZWu9MVb0Y9a001YjgapTn4QqE4= X-HE-Tag: 1618410581-635424 On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 08:17 -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > Perhaps (like the -W options for GCC) there > could be a way to specify in a Makefile which checkpatch > messages are reported/not reported? I don't claim that's > a good suggestion, but if I could optionally indicate > somewhere that "two consecutive blank lines is OK for > Greybus" (one example that comes to mind) I might do so. checkpatch already has --ignore= and --types= for the various classes of messages it emits. see: $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --list-types --verbose Dwaipayan Ray (cc'd) is supposedly working on expanding the verbose descriptions of each type.