On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 12:39:50AM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote: > H6 has IOSC calibration and an ext-osc32k input. > > H6 has the osc32k mux and the rtc-32k mux, but no fanout mux. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland > --- > drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/sun50i-rtc-ccu.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 17 ---------- > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/sun50i-rtc-ccu.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/sun50i-rtc-ccu.c > index 1dfa05c2f0e9..9603dc0d3d7b 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/sun50i-rtc-ccu.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/sun50i-rtc-ccu.c > @@ -227,6 +227,16 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_MUX_DATA_WITH_GATE(osc32k_fanout_clk, "rtc-32k-fanout", > static SUNXI_CCU_M_FW_WITH_GATE(rtc_spi_clk, "rtc-spi", "ahb", > 0x310, 0, 5, BIT(31), 0); > > +static struct ccu_common *sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_clks[] = { > + &iosc_clk, > + &iosc_32k_clk, > + &ext_osc32k_gate_clk.common, > + &osc32k_clk.common, > + &osc24M_32k_clk.common, > + &rtc_32k_mux_clk.common, > + &osc32k_fanout_clk.common, > +}; > + > static struct ccu_common *sun50i_h616_rtc_ccu_clks[] = { > &iosc_clk, > &iosc_32k_clk, > @@ -246,6 +256,21 @@ static struct ccu_common *sun50i_r329_rtc_ccu_clks[] = { > &rtc_spi_clk.common, > }; > > +static struct clk_hw_onecell_data sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_hw_clks = { > + .num = CLK_NUMBER, > + .hws = { > + [CLK_OSC32K] = &osc32k_clk.common.hw, > + [CLK_OSC32K_FANOUT] = &osc32k_fanout_clk.common.hw, > + [CLK_IOSC] = &iosc_clk.hw, > + > + [CLK_IOSC_32K] = &iosc_32k_clk.hw, > + [CLK_EXT_OSC32K_GATE] = &ext_osc32k_gate_clk.common.hw, > + [CLK_OSC24M_32K] = &osc24M_32k_clk.common.hw, > + [CLK_RTC_32K] = &rtc_32k_mux_clk.common.hw, > + [CLK_RTC_SPI] = NULL, > + }, > +}; > + > static struct clk_hw_onecell_data sun50i_h616_rtc_ccu_hw_clks = { > .num = CLK_NUMBER, > .hws = { > @@ -276,6 +301,13 @@ static struct clk_hw_onecell_data sun50i_r329_rtc_ccu_hw_clks = { > }, > }; > > +static const struct sunxi_ccu_desc sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_desc = { > + .ccu_clks = sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_clks, > + .num_ccu_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_clks), > + > + .hw_clks = &sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_hw_clks, > +}; > + > static const struct sunxi_ccu_desc sun50i_h616_rtc_ccu_desc = { > .ccu_clks = sun50i_h616_rtc_ccu_clks, > .num_ccu_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sun50i_h616_rtc_ccu_clks), > @@ -318,6 +350,23 @@ static void __init sunxi_rtc_ccu_init(struct device_node *node, > of_sunxi_ccu_probe(node, reg, desc); > } > > +static void __init sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_setup(struct device_node *node) > +{ > + struct clk_init_data *init; > + > + have_iosc_calib = 1; > + > + /* Casting away the const from a pointer to a non-const anonymous object... */ > + init = (struct clk_init_data *)osc32k_fanout_clk.common.hw.init; > + > + /* Fanout only has one parent: osc32k. */ > + init->num_parents = 1; > + > + sunxi_rtc_ccu_init(node, &sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_desc); > +} Indeed, that's not great. Maybe we should just duplicate the sun50i_h6_rtc_ccu_desc (and osc32k_fanout_clk) to cover both cases? Maxime