From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>,
Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] fastboot: sunxi: Determine MMC device at runtime
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 11:33:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5fabc04-18c0-dc31-f1a5-93501b5d9bc5@seco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524161508.2129096c@slackpad.fritz.box>
On 5/24/21 11:15 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2021 10:37:31 -0400
> Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/23/21 8:36 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> > At the moment the fastboot code relies on the Kconfig variable
>> > CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV to point to the MMC device to use for the
>> > flash command. This value needs to be the *U-Boot device number*, which
>> > is picked by the U-Boot device model at runtime. This makes it quite
>> > tricky and fragile to fix this variable at compile time, as other DT
>> > nodes and aliases influence the enumeration process.
>> >
>> > To make this process more robust, allow the device number to be picked at
>> > runtime, which sounds like a better fit to find this device number. Patch
>> > 1/3 introduces a weak function for that purpose.
>> > Patch 2/3 then implements this function for the Allwinner platform. The
>> > code follows the idea behind the existing Kconfig defaults: Use the eMMC
>> > device, if that exists, or the SD card otherwise. This patch is actually
>> > not sunxi specific, so might be adopted by other platforms as well.
>> > Patch 3/3 then drops the existing Kconfig defaults for sunxi, to clean
>> > this up and remove the implicit assumption that the eMMC device is always
>> > device 1 (as least for the fastboot code).
>> >
>> > I would be curious if others think this is the right way forward.
>> > The fact that the U-Boot device numbers are determined at runtime
>> > seems to conflict with the idea of a Kconfig variable in the first place,
>> > hence this series. This brings us one step closer to the end goal of
>> > removing the "eMMC is device 1" assumption.
>>
>> I would actually favor removing CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV
>> altogether, and just specifying the device explicitly in fastboot
>> commands. If you need to dynamically change the device, you can create
>> some aliases. E.g. you could have something like
>>
>> "fastboot_aliases=setenv fastboot_partition_alias_user ${mmcdev}.0:0"
>>
>> and then run this variable just before calling `fastboot 0` (or whatever
>> your usb device is).
>
> Fine with me. I was actually wondering about this already, but didn't
> want to disrupt every user, especially since I can't really test this
> very well.
The ideal way would be to define aliases dynamically mapping old
partition names to new syntax. So if the U-Boot shell were a bit more
expressive, one could do
for partition in $(mmc part list $mmcdev); do
env set fastboot_partition_alias_${partition} ${mmcdev}\#${partition}
done
fastboot usb 0
which would map old partition names to new-style syntax. Unfortunately,
we don't quite have that capability yet. I think defining a bunch of
aliases when you run fastboot could be... suprising. I'm not sure if
there is a good solution here.
> So can you use this explicit device naming from the host side already
> with the current code? Can you give an example how this would look
> like?
Flash the partition named "rootfs" on MMC 0 hardware partition 0
$ fastboot flash 0#rootfs root.simg
Flash the entirety of MMC 1 hardware partition 2
$ fastboot flash 1.2:0 boot2.img
For a more thorough treatment of this syntax, see [1]
> The documentation I could find only speaks of the Android
> partition names (like "system"), which requires environment variables
> to work, IIUC?
They require that you use a GPT-formatted disk with partition labels.
Alternatively, you can use aliases. There is one sentence on the
new-style syntax here [2], but I really should expand on it...
--Sean
[1] https://u-boot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage/partitions.html#partitions
[2] https://u-boot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/android/fastboot.html#partition-names
>
> Thanks,
> Andre
>
>> >
>> > I am looking forward to any comments on this series!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Andre
>> >
>> > Andre Przywara (3):
>> > fastboot: Allow runtime determination of MMC device
>> > sunxi: Implement fastboot_get_mmc_device()
>> > sunxi: Drop sunxi FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV defaults
>> >
>> > board/sunxi/board.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/fastboot/Kconfig | 4 +---
>> > drivers/fastboot/fb_command.c | 6 +++---
>> > drivers/fastboot/fb_common.c | 3 ++-
>> > drivers/fastboot/fb_mmc.c | 12 ++++++++----
>> > include/fastboot.h | 7 +++++++
>> > 6 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 0:36 [RFC PATCH 0/3] fastboot: sunxi: Determine MMC device at runtime Andre Przywara
2021-05-24 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] fastboot: Allow runtime determination of MMC device Andre Przywara
2021-05-27 13:44 ` Simon Glass
2021-05-24 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sunxi: Implement fastboot_get_mmc_device() Andre Przywara
2021-05-24 14:33 ` Sean Anderson
2021-05-24 14:57 ` Andre Przywara
2021-05-24 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sunxi: Drop sunxi FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV defaults Andre Przywara
2021-05-24 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] fastboot: sunxi: Determine MMC device at runtime Sean Anderson
2021-05-24 15:15 ` Andre Przywara
2021-05-24 15:33 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2021-05-24 15:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-05-24 15:43 ` Sean Anderson
2021-06-07 15:14 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-06-07 15:21 ` Sean Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5fabc04-18c0-dc31-f1a5-93501b5d9bc5@seco.com \
--to=sean.anderson@seco.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).