From: JC Kuo <jckuo@nvidia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <kishon@ti.com>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<nkristam@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] phy: tegra: xusb: tegra210: Do not reset UPHY PLL
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:21:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ec9045c-8722-d7cd-20f0-2c163be75619@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200928130618.GE3065790@ulmo>
Asserting reset to a PLL when it's managed by hardware power sequencer would
break sequencer's state machine. Putting PLL in reset doesn't save some extra power.
Thanks for review.
JC
On 9/28/20 9:06 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:10:30PM +0800, JC Kuo wrote:
>> Once UPHY PLL hardware power sequencer is enabled, do not assert
>> reset to PEX/SATA PLLs, otherwise UPHY PLL operation will be broken.
>> This commit removes reset_control_assert(pcie->rst) and
>> reset_control_assert(sata->rst) from PEX/SATA UPHY disable procedure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: JC Kuo <jckuo@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> new, was a part of "phy: tegra: xusb: Rearrange UPHY init on Tegra210"
>>
>> drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c
>> index f06e7bc7a51b..ef4bbcbed60b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c
>> @@ -504,7 +504,6 @@ static void tegra210_pex_uphy_disable(struct tegra_xusb_padctl *padctl)
>> if (--pcie->enable > 0)
>> goto unlock;
>>
>> - reset_control_assert(pcie->rst);
>> clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->pll);
>>
>> unlock:
>> @@ -746,7 +745,6 @@ static void tegra210_sata_uphy_disable(struct tegra_xusb_padctl *padctl)
>> if (--sata->enable > 0)
>> goto unlock;
>>
>> - reset_control_assert(sata->rst);
>> clk_disable_unprepare(sata->pll);
>>
>> unlock:
>
> Does this mean that we can no longer reset these PLLs anymore? Is that
> safe? Would we ever need to reset them for recovery or similar? For
> power saving, is disabling the clock enough, or could we save some extra
> power by putting the PLLs into reset?
>
> Thierry
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-14 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-09 8:10 [PATCH v3 00/15] Tegra XHCI controller ELPG support JC Kuo
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] clk: tegra: Add PLLE HW power sequencer control JC Kuo
2020-09-28 12:51 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] clk: tegra: Don't enable PLLE HW sequencer at init JC Kuo
2020-09-28 12:52 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] phy: tegra: xusb: Move usb3 port init for Tegra210 JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:03 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] phy: tegra: xusb: tegra210: Do not reset UPHY PLL JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:06 ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-14 3:21 ` JC Kuo [this message]
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] phy: tegra: xusb: Rearrange UPHY init on Tegra210 JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:08 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] phy: tegra: xusb: Add Tegra210 lane_iddq operation JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:10 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] phy: tegra: xusb: Add sleepwalk and suspend/resume JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:11 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] soc/tegra: pmc: Provide usb sleepwalk register map JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:17 ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-14 4:08 ` JC Kuo
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] arm64: tegra210: XUSB PADCTL add "nvidia,pmc" prop JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:18 ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-14 4:15 ` JC Kuo
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] phy: tegra: xusb: Add wake/sleepwalk for Tegra210 JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:40 ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-14 8:37 ` JC Kuo
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] phy: tegra: xusb: Tegra210 host mode VBUS control JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:42 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] phy: tegra: xusb: Add wake/sleepwalk for Tegra186 JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:50 ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-15 8:08 ` JC Kuo
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] arm64: tegra210/tegra186/tegra194: XUSB PADCTL irq JC Kuo
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] usb: host: xhci-tegra: Unlink power domain devices JC Kuo
2020-09-28 13:53 ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-15 8:09 ` JC Kuo
2020-09-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] xhci: tegra: Enable ELPG for runtime/system PM JC Kuo
2020-09-28 14:06 ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-15 8:12 ` JC Kuo
2020-09-28 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Tegra XHCI controller ELPG support Thierry Reding
2020-10-14 2:26 ` JC Kuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ec9045c-8722-d7cd-20f0-2c163be75619@nvidia.com \
--to=jckuo@nvidia.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkristam@nvidia.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).