From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Add ASoC AHUB components for Tegra210 and later Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:41:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20200721224108.GG4845@sirena.org.uk> References: <1595134890-16470-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> <159525589435.6792.708136378511410418.b4-ty@kernel.org> <72d45476-7050-187b-19d6-2ddb9b0ba97a@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <72d45476-7050-187b-19d6-2ddb9b0ba97a-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sameer Pujar Cc: robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, perex-/Fr2/VpizcU@public.gmane.org, kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, tiwai-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org, rlokhande-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, sharadg-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, nicoleotsuka-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, viswanathl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, nwartikar-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, atalambedu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, mkumard-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, dramesh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org --YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 05:22:35PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote: > I see that "[PATCH v5 07/11] ASoC: tegra: Add Tegra210 based ADMAIF driver" > is not applied as part of this. I wanted to understand if this is because > some more review comments are expected or there are other reasons? I just hadn't got that far through the patch series yet, looks fine. --YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl8XbwMACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DtvQf/e8yERKcTlsxgN756R8KDhLh+qzlkWNW3GPS8vrJKP0kOaysI2CDcHvhS Z4dtbFFRCgzRhb+m7k42pnnjZ+kEggR2iBeof1kXKLzBybxcaujyULGvI6jtfYVd Nvo3rNBhwseVrVNWgS6HURCkfp2aDTDqnXZIQpXrd/eaPwZMajW5vsgkO4vucjRe bVopPMTErkT99QWK5XxSj1ZdOFUdbzqQawZvDF75+gh1ZWDp8M64GSttm96zS/rL AiiPPVTv1F8c4nxlotfQQ59P/MyW9G5pBYdon3plnVyqYI08k6bUZYMLcHwiFYLu HykGGaZPPnMO3stUy64AKKNZmZBxyA== =mT4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85--