Hi Dmitry,

> Hello, Wolfram! Thank you! This series started with 10 small patches and
> then was growing with every new review round because more ideas were
> suggested and I needed to rebase/redo majority of the patches, hence it
> was a bit difficult to split it up into a smaller parts that could be
> applied incrementally. But I'll try to improve this in the future, thanks!

Ah, you got me wrong. What I meant was: If these patches still need
changes or updates, don't send a new version of all the patches, but
rather send incremental fixes on top of these patches. Sometimes it
happens that you end up with 30+ patches, no worries.

> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=191802
> > 
> > Is it obsolete by now?
> > 
> 
> To be honest, I don't know. The author never answered, guess he may
> reappear sometime in the future with a v2. Those patches need to be
> corrected and rebased.

Then, I will mark them as "Changes requested". Thanks for the heads up!

Regards,

   Wolfram