From: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
To: a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Question] rtc wake behavior and sysfs
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:13:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMdYzYrYdDYF_Y_TwQ65u=Ymu2_8Rs9KWm_TfXcaPGTwucT=jg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Good Morning,
While testing suspend to ram on the Ouya, I encountered an interesting
issue with the rtc-tps65910 driver.
Attempting to use rtc-wake on the default configuration returned:
rtcwake: /dev/rtc0 not enabled for wakeup events
This is due to:
eb5eba4ef722 drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c: enable/disable wake in suspend/resume
This commit changed this driver's behavior to not enable wakeup by
default, but enables it when entering sleep mode.
This seems to be odd behavior to me.
Looking at a few other rtc drivers show they simply enable themselves
as wakeup sources by default.
I also found the sysfs entries are at /sys/devices/ ..
/tps65910-rtc/power but are missing at /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/power/
I have two questions.
- Should the sysfs wakeup entries be missing at /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/power/ ?
- Shouldn't a rtc be enabled as a wakeup source by default?
Thank you for your time.
Very Respectfully,
Peter Geis
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-05 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-05 13:13 Peter Geis [this message]
2020-10-05 22:29 ` [Question] rtc wake behavior and sysfs Alexandre Belloni
2020-10-06 1:47 ` Peter Geis
2020-10-06 7:03 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMdYzYrYdDYF_Y_TwQ65u=Ymu2_8Rs9KWm_TfXcaPGTwucT=jg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).