From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] MAINTAINERS: Add Krzysztof Kozlowski as maintainer of memory controllers Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:12:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20200723073744.13400-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200723073744.13400-24-krzk@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200723073744.13400-24-krzk@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , arm@kernel.org, soc@kernel.org, Markus Mayer , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Florian Fainelli , Santosh Shilimkar , Matthias Brugger , Roger Quadros , Tony Lindgren , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 7/23/20 12:37 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The specific drivers in drivers/memory usually go via architecture (e.g. > ARM SoC) maintainers but the generic parts (of_memory.[ch]) lacked any > care. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Acked-by: Florian Fainelli What does this mean for specific drivers? For instance I tend to send updates to brcmstb_dpfe.c through the Broadcom ARM SoC pull requests, shall I continue to do this, or are you going to send memory controller subsystem pull requests including that file in the future? -- Florian