linux-toolchains.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ilog2 vs. GCC inlining heuristics
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:40:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21556974-eea1-ed6a-ea6f-3e97a6eea4bc@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021151947.GL2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>



Le 21/10/2020 à 17:19, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 03:27:18PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Based on the GCC PR97445 discussions, I'd like to propose following change,
>> which should significantly decrease the amount of code in inline functions
>> that use ilog2, but as I'm already two decades out of the Linux kernel
>> development, I'd appreciate if some kernel developer could try that (all
>> I have done is check that it gives the same results as before) and if it
>> works submit it for inclusion into the kernel?
> 
> I'll stick it in my queue and feed it to the robots.
> 

I did a mpc885_ads_defconfig build with your patch. That's far better, even better than with gcc 9 
without the patch.

I only have two instances of get_order() in vmlinux, one of it is used twice, the other is never user.

With -Winline, the reason for not inlining is for both because "the call is unlikely and the code 
size would grow"

Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-21 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-21 13:27 ilog2 vs. GCC inlining heuristics Jakub Jelinek
2020-10-21 13:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-10-21 13:45   ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-10-21 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-21 18:40   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-10-22  4:01     ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-22  7:12       ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21556974-eea1-ed6a-ea6f-3e97a6eea4bc@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).