linux-toolchains.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 02/10] perf: Remove get_perf_callchain() 'crosstask' argument
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 22:11:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chDdw4tMx9Vqw_P5D5K32pptHr4ncv8kQJr-bko6RLoBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2c5130322a419ad04ea328a22fc2908487a1e25.1699487758.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:44 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> get_perf_callchain() doesn't support cross-task unwinding, so it doesn't

For only user stacks, but it seems there's no place to get cross-task kernel
stacks too.

> make much sense to have 'crosstask' as an argument.  Instead, have
> perf_callchain() adjust 'user' accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Namhyung

> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
>  kernel/bpf/stackmap.c      | 5 ++---
>  kernel/events/callchain.c  | 6 +-----
>  kernel/events/core.c       | 8 ++++----
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index f4b05954076c..2d8fa253b9df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ extern void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct p
>  extern void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern struct perf_callchain_entry *
>  get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
> -                  u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark);
> +                  u32 max_stack, bool add_mark);
>  extern int get_callchain_buffers(int max_stack);
>  extern void put_callchain_buffers(void);
>  extern struct perf_callchain_entry *get_callchain_entry(int *rctx);
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index b0b0fbff7c18..e4827ca5378d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> @@ -294,8 +294,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>         if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
>                 max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>
> -       trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
> -                                  false, false);
> +       trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth, false);
>
>         if (unlikely(!trace))
>                 /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
> @@ -421,7 +420,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>                 trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
>         else
>                 trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
> -                                          false, false);
> +                                          false);
>         if (unlikely(!trace))
>                 goto err_fault;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
> index 1e135195250c..aa5f9d11c28d 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ put_callchain_entry(int rctx)
>
>  struct perf_callchain_entry *
>  get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
> -                  u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
> +                  u32 max_stack, bool add_mark)
>  {
>         struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
>         struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
> @@ -209,9 +209,6 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
>                 }
>
>                 if (regs) {
> -                       if (crosstask)
> -                               goto exit_put;
> -
>                         if (add_mark)
>                                 perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_USER);
>
> @@ -219,7 +216,6 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
>                 }
>         }
>
> -exit_put:
>         put_callchain_entry(rctx);
>
>         return entry;
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index b0d62df7df4e..5e41a3b70bcd 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -7592,16 +7592,16 @@ perf_callchain(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>         bool kernel = !event->attr.exclude_callchain_kernel;
>         bool user   = !event->attr.exclude_callchain_user;
> -       /* Disallow cross-task user callchains. */
> -       bool crosstask = event->ctx->task && event->ctx->task != current;
>         const u32 max_stack = event->attr.sample_max_stack;
>         struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain;
>
> +       /* Disallow cross-task user callchains. */
> +       user &= !event->ctx->task || event->ctx->task == current;
> +
>         if (!kernel && !user)
>                 return &__empty_callchain;
>
> -       callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user,
> -                                      max_stack, crosstask, true);
> +       callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_stack, true);
>         return callchain ?: &__empty_callchain;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-11  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09  0:41 [PATCH RFC 00/10] perf: user space sframe unwinding Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] perf: Remove get_perf_callchain() 'init_nr' argument Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-11  6:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] perf: Remove get_perf_callchain() 'crosstask' argument Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-11  6:11   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2023-11-11 20:53     ` Jordan Rome
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] perf: Simplify get_perf_callchain() user logic Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-11  6:11   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] perf: Introduce deferred user callchains Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-11  6:57   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-11 18:49     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-11 18:54       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-13 16:56       ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-13 17:21         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-13 17:48           ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-13 18:49             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-13 19:16               ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-15 16:13         ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-20 14:03           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] perf/x86: Add HAVE_PERF_CALLCHAIN_DEFERRED Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] unwind: Introduce generic user space unwinding interfaces Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] unwind/x86: Add HAVE_USER_UNWIND Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] perf/x86: Use user_unwind interface Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] unwind: Introduce SFrame user space unwinding Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09 19:31   ` Indu Bhagat
2023-11-09 19:37     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09 19:49       ` Steven Rostedt
2023-11-09 19:53         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] unwind/x86/64: Add HAVE_USER_UNWIND_SFRAME Josh Poimboeuf
2023-11-09  0:45 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] perf: user space sframe unwinding Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAM9d7chDdw4tMx9Vqw_P5D5K32pptHr4ncv8kQJr-bko6RLoBw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).