From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v4 2/3] kasan: Treat meminstrinsic as builtins in uninstrumented files
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:55:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNN9EPTLR5-HvpCtYjauMTT=Ud86wqV54anSYC=vgZ70zw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZehvF1o4rQJah=SXaS-AXWs--h2CDaUca-hJK=ZTD8kTg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 12:07, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it also safe to remove custom mem* definitions from
> arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h now?
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc8/source/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h#L88
Yes, I think so - sent another patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y+94tm7xoeTGqPgs@elver.google.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-16 23:45 [PATCH -tip v4 1/3] kasan: Emit different calls for instrumentable memintrinsics Marco Elver
2023-02-16 23:45 ` [PATCH -tip v4 2/3] kasan: Treat meminstrinsic as builtins in uninstrumented files Marco Elver
2023-02-17 11:07 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-02-17 12:55 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2023-02-16 23:45 ` [PATCH -tip v4 3/3] kasan: test: Fix test for new meminstrinsic instrumentation Marco Elver
2023-02-17 9:11 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-02-17 11:07 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-02-17 11:07 ` [PATCH -tip v4 1/3] kasan: Emit different calls for instrumentable memintrinsics Andrey Konovalov
2023-02-17 12:53 ` [PATCH -tip v4 4/4] kasan, x86: Don't rename memintrinsics in uninstrumented files Marco Elver
2023-02-17 13:10 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-02-17 17:37 ` [PATCH -tip v4 1/3] kasan: Emit different calls for instrumentable memintrinsics Naresh Kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANpmjNN9EPTLR5-HvpCtYjauMTT=Ud86wqV54anSYC=vgZ70zw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).