linux-trace-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] [WIP] trace-cmd: Add new subcomand "trace-cmd perf"
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:03:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218210352.61470b93@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203060226.476475-6-tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>

On Thu,  3 Dec 2020 08:02:26 +0200
"Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com> wrote:

> +static int perf_mmap(struct perf_cpu *perf)
> +{
> +	mmap_mask = NUM_PAGES * getpagesize() - 1;
> +
> +	/* associate a buffer with the file */
> +	perf->mpage = mmap(NULL, (NUM_PAGES + 1) * getpagesize(),
> +			PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, perf->perf_fd, 0);
> +	if (perf->mpage == MAP_FAILED)
> +		return -1;
> +	return 0;
> +}

BTW, I found that the above holds the conversions we need for the local
clock!

        printf("time_shift=%d\n", perf->mpage->time_shift);
        printf("time_mult=%d\n", perf->mpage->time_mult);
        printf("time_offset=%lld\n", perf->mpage->time_offset);

Which gives me:

time_shift=31
time_mult=633046315
time_offset=-115773323084683

[ one for each CPU ]

The ftrace local clock is defined by:

u64 notrace trace_clock_local(void)
{
	u64 clock;
	preempt_disable_notrace();
	clock = sched_clock();
	preempt_enable_notrace();
	return clock;
}

Where

u64 sched_clock(void)
{
	if (static_branch_likely(&__use_tsc)) { // true
		u64 tsc_now = rdtsc();

		/* return the value in ns */
		return cycles_2_ns(tsc_now);
	}

and

static __always_inline unsigned long long cycles_2_ns(unsigned long long cyc)
{
	struct cyc2ns_data data;
	unsigned long long ns;

	cyc2ns_read_begin(&data); // <- this is where the data comes from

	ns = data.cyc2ns_offset;
	ns += mul_u64_u32_shr(cyc, data.cyc2ns_mul, data.cyc2ns_shift);

	cyc2ns_read_end();

	return ns;
}

__always_inline void cyc2ns_read_begin(struct cyc2ns_data *data)
{
	int seq, idx;

	preempt_disable_notrace();

	do {
		seq = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.seq.seqcount.sequence);
		idx = seq & 1;

		data->cyc2ns_offset = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.data[idx].cyc2ns_offset);
		data->cyc2ns_mul    = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.data[idx].cyc2ns_mul);
		data->cyc2ns_shift  = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.data[idx].cyc2ns_shift);

	} while (unlikely(seq != this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.seq.seqcount.sequence)));
}

The offset, multiplier and shift are from the cyc2ns.data[idx] (per
cpu) is what determines the conversion from x86 cycles to nanoseconds.

Does user space have access to that? Yes! Via perf!

void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
			       struct perf_event_mmap_page *userpg, u64 now)
{
[..]
	cyc2ns_read_begin(&data);

	offset = data.cyc2ns_offset + __sched_clock_offset;

	/*
	 * Internal timekeeping for enabled/running/stopped times
	 * is always in the local_clock domain.
	 */
	userpg->cap_user_time = 1;
	userpg->time_mult = data.cyc2ns_mul;
	userpg->time_shift = data.cyc2ns_shift;
	userpg->time_offset = offset - now;

Those above values are the ones I printed at the beginning of this
email.

Hence, we can use x86-tsc as the clock for both the host and guest, and
then using perf find out how to convert that to what the 'local' clock
would produce. At least the multiplier and the shfit.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-19  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-03  6:02 [PATCH 0/5] Initial trace-cmd perf support Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)
2020-12-03  6:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] trace-cmd: Internal refactoring of pid address map logic Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)
2020-12-03  6:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] trace-cmd: Make read_file_string() non static Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)
2020-12-03  6:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] trace-cmd: New internal APIs for reading ELF header Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)
2020-12-03  6:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] trace-cmd: Add a new option in trace.dat file for the address to function name mapping Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)
2020-12-03  6:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] [WIP] trace-cmd: Add new subcomand "trace-cmd perf" Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)
2021-02-19  2:03   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-02-19  3:53     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-19 17:51       ` Dario Faggioli
2021-02-19  7:16     ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-02-19 14:36       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-19 17:56         ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-02-19 19:11           ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210218210352.61470b93@oasis.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).