From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB6EC48BCF for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCF3613DC for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229517AbhFIUTO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:19:14 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55738 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229504AbhFIUTO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:19:14 -0400 Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEA0D613D4; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:17:17 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace-cmd: Add option to poll trace buffers Message-ID: <20210609161717.10e259b2@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20210602100542.076a4b4e@oasis.local.home> References: <20210602090803.12233-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com> <20210602100542.076a4b4e@oasis.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:05:42 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 11:08:03 +0200 > Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > > NOTE: I'm aware that TRACECMD_RECORD_POLL kind of clashes with > > TRACECMD_RECORD_BLOCK. That's why I renamed it. There might be a > > clean way to merge them into a single flag, but it's not clear to > > me why was TRACECMD_RECORD_BLOCK needed in the first place (since > > it only affects splicing). > > Yeah that was poorly named, and was added when streaming was added (not > recording to a file, but to simply read from splice). I don't remember > exactly all that happened back them, but you are correct, it can > probably be better organized. > > Thanks for sending the patch, I'll have a look at it this week. FYI, I pushed this patch up to the git repo. Thanks, -- Steve