From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] libtraceevent: Add APIs for printing the fields of a record
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:04:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210908160425.2ed9ec07@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823095618.138887-4-y.karadz@gmail.com>
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:56:17 +0300
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@gmail.com> wrote:
> The new methods can print all unique data fielsd, or only a subset of
> the fields of the trace event. The print format is derived from the
> parsing tokens (tep_print_parse objects) of the event.
The more I look at this, the more I think we should have a
"selected_fields" mask, and not a ignored mask. At least for the API.
The internal functions can stay the same. That is, the internal
functions have the ignored_mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
> ---
> +/**
> + * tep_record_print_selected_fields - print the field name followed by the
I think the above should be "tep_record_print_fields" ?
> + * record's field value for a selected subset of record fields.
> + * @s: The seq to print to
> + * @record: The record to get the event from
> + * @event: The event that the field is for
> + */
> +void tep_record_print_fields(struct trace_seq *s,
> + struct tep_record *record,
> + struct tep_event *event)
> +{
> + print_selected_fields(s, record->data, event, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * tep_record_print_selected_fields - print the field name followed by the
> + * record's field value for a selected subset of record fields.
> + * @s: The seq to print to
> + * @record: The record to get the event from
> + * @event: The event that the field is for
> + * @ignore_mask: Bit mask defining the fields to be ignored
change to:
@select_mask: Bit mask defining the fields to record
> + */
> +void tep_record_print_selected_fields(struct trace_seq *s,
> + struct tep_record *record,
> + struct tep_event *event,
> + unsigned long long ignore_mask)
unsigned long long select_mask)
> +{
Since print_selected_fields() will still have the ignore_mask, you can
have:
unsigned long long ignore_mask = ~select_mask;
> + print_selected_fields(s, record->data, event, ignore_mask);
The above would remain the same.
-- Steve
> +}
> +
> static int print_function(struct trace_seq *s, const char *format,
> void *data, int size, struct tep_event
> *event, struct tep_print_arg *arg)
> diff --git a/src/event-parse.h b/src/event-parse.h
> index d4a876f..08dcbd8 100644
> --- a/src/event-parse.h
> +++ b/src/event-parse.h
> @@ -545,6 +545,13 @@ int tep_cmdline_pid(struct tep_handle *tep,
> struct tep_cmdline *cmdline);
> void tep_print_field(struct trace_seq *s, void *data,
> struct tep_format_field *field);
> +void tep_record_print_fields(struct trace_seq *s,
> + struct tep_record *record,
> + struct tep_event *event);
> +void tep_record_print_selected_fields(struct trace_seq *s,
> + struct tep_record *record,
> + struct tep_event *event,
> + unsigned long long
> ignore_mask); void tep_print_fields(struct trace_seq *s, void *data,
> int size __maybe_unused, struct tep_event
> *event); int tep_strerror(struct tep_handle *tep, enum tep_errno
> errnum,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-08 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 9:56 [PATCH v7 0/4] libtraceevent: Optimize the print of tep fields Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-08-23 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] libtraceevent: Improve tep_print_field() Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-08-23 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] libtraceevent: Optimize tep_print_fields() Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-08-23 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] libtraceevent: Add APIs for printing the fields of a record Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-09-08 20:04 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-08-23 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] libtraceevent: Add documentation for the new printing APIs Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-09-08 20:06 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] libtraceevent: Optimize the print of tep fields Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210908160425.2ed9ec07@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=y.karadz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).