From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B66FC54EAA for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230484AbjAZVCx (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:02:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35694 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229486AbjAZVCw (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:02:52 -0500 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C84CE559F; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 13:02:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA94CE2383; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B821BC433EF; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:02:40 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Ross Zwisler Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux Trace Devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Tom Zanussi Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: ftrace: always use canonical ftrace path Message-ID: <20230126160240.0c2375c5@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20230125213251.2013791-1-zwisler@google.com> <87a6259mll.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <20230126153438.5e98da15@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 13:41:05 -0700 Ross Zwisler wrote: > Yep, I'll send out patches to take care of the rest, just wanted to > send this out since I had it ready. > I'm planning on dividing up the patches by subsystem/maintainer, but > am open to suggestions if that sounds incorrect. Breaking it up by subsystem/maintainer sounds like the right approach. Thanks Ross, -- Steve