From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAE2C3498B for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF285246B8 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sKMHb2CM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726704AbfLMLoI (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 06:44:08 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:32862 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725980AbfLMLoH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 06:44:07 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 21so2328821ljr.0 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 03:44:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SFgMUGfv5O6aUKxkjzg4z786Lcidv+V/S+pYGimRQWA=; b=sKMHb2CMhec5qRiBz44C/m1OokecHMxN2Z+8jDrbUTwn53A/qK3xg2lgVFRriP5JZH UBJ7rQvLam65WYTn/re9m5vo7mIJhuSx3o/0WTBtZbMxNF/4SqRDs9bjHFp24fbhy2E6 BbH9NS6DHTJYgxXfGrwkEXpCh7BqoGWTSE+B8sQIkLmM6D7NCUNEmmVPPJgsuahkBZny QVR7M+Z2Gqx9c2JvUP/93bTbAT9sHupB6N7fWYQeHzNxXIFNf+hyqD9E1Ybu7bG4xj1d Z89wy6gzy/u3tonkB1afmC81VJ8ofWWepN1ZYbgH1+IPMI462tJdE5VLU1oFkxMD/VRk /+9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SFgMUGfv5O6aUKxkjzg4z786Lcidv+V/S+pYGimRQWA=; b=WOdSSol3kCn+qemRIFCmYvbspuVTNMmf0Al2AE1XwI9pKxw4/0/eOmvQAqJ+t78hGv 2GfSszbISAQSKxMWaGlba+ppla1TKEXYOvssfJxY6Bx0B5HPMmjJ8zQmYsHjpKkwvY7g e0ywRYCQYgOr/2RDCHCFrRV7z3nnMTVqXHqIAjbsK3H2wAn6Hp3Dgq/fRXmou2AeT6Zx 5hNidYbZWbfrTw66GUPYERgKzIa3McP6uIonu/KZTMWFeXrW670O5xPT1sIoc//gPFDn x3doWDK2tYcS9v0Ap7yVCkz7iPDzUffMRhN14nOusLPPX3YlBKFahUh/rMhtr1CdAP8J 9KIg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVv9cM068sUud3JbVLuv4HxbuOlMURLCjCyV6ATB0VnasmYGH87 Go/GYeaUulQeQcRaLYFv2iz7+7OK X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqynwKsmiG6cb1HS4G4wbUYwZnCQ5FUNs7XKKSB+C5EeDHO3cXoxQayLRgbdY4pjXOBKRQhVDg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9bcc:: with SMTP id w12mr9314186ljj.105.1576237444405; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 03:44:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.27.112.58] ([146.247.46.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm4412584lfe.5.2019.12.13.03.44.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 03:44:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-shark: Retrieve the home of root from "/etc/passwd" To: Slavomir Kaslev Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org References: <20191128114500.6289-1-y.karadz@gmail.com> From: "Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" Message-ID: <9fac1a2e-cb68-453e-ffed-1997021ce5e8@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:43:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-trace-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org On 12.12.19 г. 17:18 ч., Slavomir Kaslev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 3:30 PM Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) > wrote: > [...] > >> Thanks for pointing out this! >> This simplifies the patch a lot. I am sending a new version. > > I just saw the patch and I think I mislead you (sorry about that) by > referring you to getpwent(3), since getpwuid(3) is a better match for > this use-case and will make the patch even smaller. Yes, getpwuid(3) is perfect. Thanks a lot! Sending v3. Y.