From: "Tzvetomir (Ceco) Stoyanov" <tstoyanov@vmware.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ideals for tep plugin options
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:21:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACqStod9=8xta3QmdLX5BW+fmHL+ohS-ows0mWkRnt3KwxNp5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200106113026.75893f92@gandalf.local.home>
Hi Steven,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:30 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tzvetomir,
>
> I was looking at the plugin options, and I believe it needs to be
> updated.
>
> 1) the tep_plugin_option structure:
>
> - rename "file" to "plugin"
> - remove "plugin_alias"
>
> 2) Currently we have the following plugin option functions exported in
> trace-cmd:
>
> char **tep_plugin_list_options(void);
> void tep_plugin_free_options_list(char **list);
> int tep_plugin_add_options(const char *name,
> struct tep_plugin_option *options);
> int tep_plugin_add_option(const char *name, const char *val);
> void tep_plugin_remove_options(struct tep_plugin_option *options);
> void tep_plugin_print_options(struct trace_seq *s);
> void tep_print_plugins(struct trace_seq *s,
> const char *prefix, const char *suffix,
> const struct tep_plugin_list *list);
>
> What we should only have is:
>
> int tep_plugin_add_options(const char *plugin,
> struct tep_plugin_option *options);
> int tep_plugin_set_option(const char *plugin, const char *name,
> const char *val);
> int tep_plugin_remove_options(struct tep_plugin_option *options);
> struct tep_plugin_option const * const tep_plugin_options_list(void);
>
>
> Where:
>
> tep_plugin_add_options() is basically the same as we have now. But we
> should change it so that if "plugin" is already registered, it
> should fail with -EBUSY.
>
> tep_plugin_set_option() lets us update the option. If "plugin" is
> NULL, then it will ignore that value, and will set all options with
> "name" to "val", regardless of what plugin it belongs to.
>
> tep_plugin_remove_options() is basically the same as what we have now,
> and removes the options from the list.
>
> tep_plugin_options_list() returns an immutable list of all the
> registered plugin options. This is the list that the application can
> use to see what options are registered, as well as their default
> (and current) values.
>
> Does this make sense?
Yes, it makes sense. I'll submit a patch set with these changes, in
the kernel tree.
I'm going to add also a check at the plugin loading time, if it is
already loaded -
the old one will be unloaded before the new one is registered.
>
> -- Steve
--
Tzvetomir (Ceco) Stoyanov
VMware Open Source Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-09 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-06 16:30 Ideals for tep plugin options Steven Rostedt
2020-01-09 13:21 ` Tzvetomir (Ceco) Stoyanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACqStod9=8xta3QmdLX5BW+fmHL+ohS-ows0mWkRnt3KwxNp5w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tstoyanov@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).