linux-trace-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haoran Luo <www@aegistudio.net>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: www@aegistudio.net, linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] tracing: fix bug in rb_per_cpu_empty() that might cause deadloop.
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:12:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPgrN85WL9VyrZ55@aegistudio> (raw)

The "rb_per_cpu_empty()" misinterpret the condition (as not-empty) when
"head_page" and "commit_page" of "struct ring_buffer_per_cpu" points to
the same buffer page, whose "buffer_data_page" is empty and "read" field
is non-zero.

An error scenario could be constructed as followed (kernel perspective):

1. All pages in the buffer has been accessed by reader(s) so that all of
them will have non-zero "read" field.

2. Read and clear all buffer pages so that "rb_num_of_entries()" will
return 0 rendering there's no more data to read. It is also required
that the "read_page", "commit_page" and "tail_page" points to the same
page, while "head_page" is the next page of them.

3. Invoke "ring_buffer_lock_reserve()" with large enough "length"
so that it shot pass the end of current tail buffer page. Now the
"head_page", "commit_page" and "tail_page" points to the same page.

4. Discard current event with "ring_buffer_discard_commit()", so that
"head_page", "commit_page" and "tail_page" points to a page whose buffer
data page is now empty.

When the error scenario has been constructed, "tracing_read_pipe" will
be trapped inside a deadloop: "trace_empty()" returns 0 since
"rb_per_cpu_empty()" returns 0 when it hits the CPU containing such
constructed ring buffer. Then "trace_find_next_entry_inc()" always
return NULL since "rb_num_of_entries()" reports there's no more entry
to read. Finally "trace_seq_to_user()" returns "-EBUSY" spanking
"tracing_read_pipe" back to the start of the "waitagain" loop.

I've also written a proof-of-concept script to construct the scenario
and trigger the bug automatically, you can use it to trace and validate
my reasoning above:

  https://github.com/aegistudio/RingBufferDetonator.git

Tests has been carried out on linux kernel 5.14-rc2
(2734d6c1b1a089fb593ef6a23d4b70903526fe0c), my fixed version
of kernel (for testing whether my update fixes the bug) and
some older kernels (for range of affected kernels). Test result is
also attached to the proof-of-concept repository.

Signed-off-by: Haoran Luo <www@aegistudio.net>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index d1463eac11a3..e592d1df6f88 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -3880,10 +3880,30 @@ static bool rb_per_cpu_empty(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
 	if (unlikely(!head))
 		return true;
 
-	return reader->read == rb_page_commit(reader) &&
-		(commit == reader ||
-		 (commit == head &&
-		  head->read == rb_page_commit(commit)));
+	/* Reader should exhaust content in reader page */
+	if (reader->read != rb_page_commit(reader))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * If writers are committing on the reader page, knowing all
+	 * committed content has been read, the ring buffer is empty.
+	 */
+	if (commit == reader)
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * If writers are committing on a page other than reader page
+	 * and head page, there should always be content to read.
+	 */
+	if (commit != head)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Writers are committing on the head page, we just need
+	 * to care about there're committed data, and the reader will
+	 * swap reader page with head page when it is to read data.
+	 */
+	return rb_page_commit(commit) == 0;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 14:12 Haoran Luo [this message]
2021-07-22  8:20 ` Haoran Luo
2021-07-22 14:32   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YPgrN85WL9VyrZ55@aegistudio \
    --to=www@aegistudio.net \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] tracing: fix bug in rb_per_cpu_empty() that might cause deadloop.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).