From: ahmadkhorrami <ahmadkhorrami@ut.ac.ir>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linux-trace Users <linux-trace-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-trace-users-owner@vger.kernel.org,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Wrong Perf Backtraces
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:40:36 +0430
Message-ID: <9551c616b045299482fc9e26281c1062@ut.ac.ir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325185831.GB19495@redhat.com>
Thanks. But should I attach the files to the e-mail?
On 2020-03-25 23:28, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: On Wed,
> Mar 25, 2020 at 07:48:39PM +0430, ahmadkhorrami wrote: Hi,
>
> Could you give me some hints about where the actual problem takes
> place? Is
> the problem with "Perf" or the hardware part (i.e., "Hardware
> Performance
> Counters")? Can I revise the problem by simply modifying the code? How
> much
> work is needed?
> heya,
> might be some callchain processing bug, but I can't reproduce it on my
> setup..
> would you have/make some simple example that would reproduce the issue?
>
> Another option is that you'd send perf.data together with 'perf
> archive' data.
>
> Also.. we support 2 dwarf unwinders (libunwind/libdw).. not sure which
> one you
> have compiled in, but would be helpful to see if the other shows the
> same.
perf -vv
+
ldd `which perf`
Output will help us find out which unwinder is being used, as well as
the version of perf being used.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <157597d74ff17f781d9de7e7e3defd13@ut.ac.ir>
2020-03-22 20:24 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-23 0:34 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <21b3df4080709f193d62b159887e2a83@ut.ac.ir>
2020-03-23 8:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-23 10:03 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-25 15:18 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-25 15:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-25 18:54 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-25 18:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-25 19:10 ` ahmadkhorrami [this message]
2020-03-25 19:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-25 20:01 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-25 20:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-25 21:02 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-25 21:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-25 21:37 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-25 21:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-25 22:21 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-25 23:09 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-26 9:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-26 13:20 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-26 15:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-26 18:19 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-26 18:21 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-27 9:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-27 10:59 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-27 11:04 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-27 12:10 ` Milian Wolff
2020-03-27 12:58 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-27 13:25 ` Milian Wolff
2020-03-27 13:33 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-27 18:43 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-27 22:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-27 23:12 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-28 23:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-29 0:43 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-29 1:16 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-29 11:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-29 11:52 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-29 12:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-29 12:39 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-29 13:50 ` Milian Wolff
2020-03-29 14:23 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-29 19:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-30 6:09 ` Milian Wolff
2020-03-30 13:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-30 13:49 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-30 19:05 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-30 21:05 ` debuginfod-based dwarf downloading, was " Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-03-31 9:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-31 14:00 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-03-31 4:43 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 9:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-31 11:53 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 12:43 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 13:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-31 13:39 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 14:44 ` Milian Wolff
2020-03-31 15:02 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 15:05 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 15:29 ` Milian Wolff
2020-03-31 16:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-31 19:20 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 19:17 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-03-31 20:57 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-04-04 1:01 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-04-11 16:42 ` ahmadkhorrami
2020-04-11 21:04 ` ahmadkhorrami
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9551c616b045299482fc9e26281c1062@ut.ac.ir \
--to=ahmadkhorrami@ut.ac.ir \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-trace-users-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-Trace-Users Archive on lore.kernel.org
Archives are clonable:
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-users/0 linux-trace-users/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 linux-trace-users linux-trace-users/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-users \
linux-trace-users@vger.kernel.org
public-inbox-index linux-trace-users
Example config snippet for mirrors
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-users
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git