From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgxu519@zoho.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:15:24 +0800
From: admin <cgxu519@zoho.com.cn>
Reply-To: cgxu519@zoho.com.cn
Message-ID: <16d7200e45c.1398c37e020790.5506577327176178828@zoho.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: 
Subject: syncfs improvement for overlayfs
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: miklos <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-unionfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>, cgxu519 <cgxu519@zoho.com.cn>
List-ID: <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>

Hi Miklos,

It's been a while since I posted my last version of syncfs improvement patch[1]
and I noticed it isn't get merged yet. If you think this patch is still valuable then
I would like to do rebase on latest overlayfs tree and resend for review.
What do you think?


[1]
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-unionfs/msg04174.html

Thanks,
Chengguang